国际肿瘤学杂志››2023,Vol. 50››Issue (10): 585-591.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20230612-00112
收稿日期:
2023-06-12修回日期:
2023-09-12出版日期:
2023-10-08发布日期:
2023-11-08通讯作者:
林永娟 E-mail:lingyongjuan0218@126.com作者简介:
第一联系人:谢宇和郑胜男对本文有同等贡献基金资助:
Xie Yu, Zheng Shengnan, Huang Mingmin, Guo Aibin, Yin Zhenyu, Lin Yongjuan()
Received:
2023-06-12Revised:
2023-09-12Online:
2023-10-08Published:
2023-11-08Contact:
Lin Yongjuan E-mail:lingyongjuan0218@126.comAbout author:
First author contact:Xie Yu and Zheng Shengnan are contributed equally to the articleSupported by:
摘要:
目的研究肺腺癌软脑膜转移(LM)患者鞘内注射化疗后脑脊液培美曲塞的药代动力学,以指导临床鞘内注射化疗的给药方案。方法收集2019年11月至2022年11月于南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院经Ommaya囊行培美曲塞鞘内注射化疗的肺腺癌LM患者共21例,根据培美曲塞剂量分为30、40、50 mg组(n=10、n=4、n=7),各组于首次鞘内注射后0、0.5、1、2、4、6、12、24、48 h留取脑脊液,每个治疗周期第8天留取脑脊液。采用反相高效液相色谱法测定脑脊液中药物浓度,明确药物相关药代动力学参数,比较各剂量组间脑脊液中培美曲塞浓度差异;观察并比较不同治疗周期鞘内注射化疗后脑脊液培美曲塞浓度变化。结果不同剂量组患者首次鞘内注射后0、0.5、1、2、4、6、12、24、48 h脑脊液中药物浓度差异均具有统计学意义(30 mg组:F=20.56,P<0.001;40 mg组:F=27.06,P<0.001;50 mg组:F=28.63,P<0.001),鞘内注射后0.5、1、2、4、6、12 h与鞘内注射0 h相比,各剂量组脑脊液药物浓度差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。相较于30 mg组,50 mg组鞘内注射后1、2、4、6、12、24 h脑脊液中药物浓度增加,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。脑脊液培美曲塞药代动力学分析显示,30、40和50 mg组药物浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)0-∞分别为(5 696.12±283.32)、(7 886.29±396.57)、(14 202.70±440.19)h·mg/L,差异具有统计学意义(F=1 159.00,P<0.001);与30、40 mg组比较,50 mg组AUC0-∞增加(均P<0.05);与30 mg组比较,40 mg组AUC0-∞增加(P<0.05)。3个剂量组半衰期分别为(8.75±0.23)、(11.29±0.59)、(16.42±1.23)h,差异具有统计学意义(F=206.80,P<0.001);与30、40 mg组比较,50 mg组半衰期延长(均P<0.05);与30 mg组比较,40 mg组半衰期延长(P<0.05)。3个剂量组达峰时间分别为(1.55±0.10)、(1.00±0.01)、(1.43±0.11)h,差异具有统计学意义(F=48.11,P<0.001);与30 mg组比较,40、50 mg组脑脊液中药物浓度达峰时间变短(均P<0.05)。3个剂量组清除率分别为(7.02±2.46)、(5.80±1.25)、(3.66±1.32)L/h,差异具有统计学意义(F=6.02,P=0.009);与30 mg组比较,50 mg组清除率下降(P<0.05)。3个剂量组达峰浓度分别为(540.45±32.25)、(820.75±46.47)、(1 014.78±64.96)mg/L,差异具有统计学意义(F=207.70,P<0.001);与30、40 mg组比较,50 mg组的达峰浓度增加(均P<0.05);与30 mg组比较,40 mg组达峰浓度增加(P<0.05)。动态监测4个治疗周期鞘内注射化疗后脑脊液药物浓度,其中30 mg组脑脊液浓度分别为(13.76±4.79)、(11.41±7.08)、(9.41±2.59)、(7.86±4.02)mg/L,40 mg组脑脊液浓度分别为(14.45±6.59)、(12.87±15.73)、(11.24±2.48)、(9.09±3.38)mg/L,50 mg组脑脊液浓度分别为(12.94±10.34)、(9.72±7.62)、(8.15±8.17)、(4.34±4.21)mg/L;30 mg组不同鞘内注射周期脑脊液中药物浓度差异有统计学意义(F=4.04,P=0.016),与第1周期相比,第3、4周期脑脊液中药物浓度下降(均P<0.05);40和50 mg组不同治疗周期脑脊液药物浓度差异均无统计学意义(F=0.28,P=0.837;F=3.57,P=0.066)。结论反相高效液相色谱法可有效检测脑脊液中培美曲塞浓度,动态监测脑脊液中培美曲塞浓度可以为肺腺癌LM患者临床鞘内注射化疗给药剂量和治疗周期提供依据。
谢宇, 郑胜男, 黄明敏, 郭爱斌, 尹震宇, 林永娟. 基于脑脊液药代动力学的培美曲塞应用于肺腺癌软脑膜转移患者鞘内注射化疗的临床研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(10): 585-591.
Xie Yu, Zheng Shengnan, Huang Mingmin, Guo Aibin, Yin Zhenyu, Lin Yongjuan. Pemetrexed clinical trial for intrathecal injection chemotherapy based on cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2023, 50(10): 585-591.
表1
21例接受培美曲塞鞘内注射化疗的肺腺癌LM患者临床特征(例/ $\bar{x} \pm s$)"
基本指标 | 30 mg组 (n=10) |
40 mg组 (n=4) |
50 mg组 (n=7) |
χ2/ F值 |
P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | |||||
男 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0.80 | 0.725 |
女 | 7 | 2 | 4 | ||
年龄(岁) | |||||
≤65 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 2.12 | 0.524 |
>65 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
吸烟史 | |||||
既往或目前吸烟 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0.34 | >0.999 |
无吸烟史 | 6 | 2 | 4 | ||
肺癌至LM时间(月) | |||||
≤24 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1.15 | 0.622 |
>24 | 4 | 1 | 4 | ||
LM临床症状 | |||||
头痛/恶心/呕吐 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0.52 | >0.999 |
肢体乏力麻木 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1.17 | 0.789 |
颅神经障碍 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0.31 | >0.999 |
癫痫 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.83 | >0.999 |
颈项强直 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.52 | >0.999 |
合并脑转移 | |||||
是 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0.79 | 0.850 |
否 | 5 | 1 | 3 | ||
KPS评分(分) | 61.00±14.49 | 60.00±14.14 | 65.71±11.34 | 0.33 | 0.723 |
头痛评分(分) | 3.60±1.58 | 4.00±2.45 | 4.29±4.03 | 0.13 | 0.879 |
RANO评分(分) | |||||
≤4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1.15 | 0.622 |
>4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | ||
脑脊液细胞学阳性 | |||||
是 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 0.59 | >0.999 |
否 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
典型磁共振异常 | |||||
有 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0.52 | >0.999 |
无 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||
基因型 | |||||
EGFR突变 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 1.05 | 0.763 |
ALK重排 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
表2
21例接受不同剂量培美曲塞鞘内注射化疗的肺腺癌LM患者48 h内脑脊液中药物浓度分析($\bar{x} \pm s$,mg/L)"
时间(h) | 30 mg组(n=10) | 40 mg组(n=4) | 50 mg组(n=7) | F/t值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 11.52±12.56 | 24.06±9.77 | 22.44±16.69 | 1.87 | 0.184 | ||
0.5 | 277.96±92.34a | 267.99±50.69a | - | 0.20 | 0.844 | ||
1 | 593.29±305.68a | 631.61±191.06a | 986.20±256.81ab | 4.58 | 0.025 | ||
2 | 271.96±112.75a | 468.57±114.75ab | 436.11±137.68ab | 5.54 | 0.013 | ||
4 | 221.79±91.66a | 345.40±53.34a | 578.00±292.91ab | 7.88 | 0.003 | ||
6 | 176.04±91.89a | 225.66±111.91a | 311.34±56.46ab | 5.12 | 0.017 | ||
12 | 153.50±65.56a | 180.31±95.10a | 252.11±75.44ab | 3.66 | 0.046 | ||
24 | 133.93±90.99a | 55.17±31.72b | 275.03±17.95abc | 16.15 | <0.001 | ||
48 | 14.69±10.40 | 14.85±10.18 | 19.22±10.23 | 0.44 | 0.650 | ||
F值 | 20.56 | 27.06 | 28.63 | ||||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
表3
21例接受不同剂量培美曲塞鞘内注射化疗的肺腺癌LM患者脑脊液中药代动力学参数($\bar{x} \pm s$)"
指标 | 30 mg组(n=10) | 40 mg组(n=4) | 50 mg组(n=7) | F值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC0-∞(h·mg/L) | 5 696.12±283.32 | 7 886.29±396.57a | 14 202.70±440.19ab | 1 159.00 | <0.001 |
MRT0-∞(h) | 13.14±3.20 | 13.20±8.21 | 14.31±3.82 | 0.15 | 0.865 |
Zeta(1/h) | 0.085±0.023 | 0.073±0.030 | 0.060±0.029 | 1.86 | 0.185 |
半衰期(h) | 8.75±0.23 | 11.29±0.59a | 16.42±1.23ab | 206.80 | <0.001 |
达峰时间(h) | 1.55±0.10 | 1.00±0.01a | 1.43±0.11a | 48.11 | <0.001 |
表观分布容积(L) | 78.00±4.82 | 76.67±5.78 | 73.72±2.48 | 1.98 | 0.168 |
清除率(L/h) | 7.02±2.46 | 5.80±1.25 | 3.66±1.32a | 6.02 | 0.009 |
达峰浓度(mg/L) | 540.45±32.25 | 820.75±46.47a | 1 014.78±64.96ab | 207.70 | <0.001 |
[1] | Li N, Bian Z, Cong M, et al. Survival outcomes of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis[J].Front Oncol,2021,11: 723562. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.723562. |
[2] | Fan C, Zhao Q, Li L, et al. Efficacy and safety of intrathecal pemetrexed combined with dexamethasone for treating tyrosine kinase inhibitor-failed leptomeningeal metastases from EGFR-mutant NSCLC—a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase 1/2 clinical trial (unique identifier: ChiCTR1800016615)[J].J Thorac Oncol,2021,16(8): 1359-1368. DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2021.04.018. |
[3] | Zhou T, Zhu S, Xiong Q, et al. Intrathecal chemotherapy combined with systemic therapy in patients with refractory leptomeningeal metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study[J].BMC Cancer,2023,23(1): 333. DOI:10.1186/s12885-023-10806-5. pmid:37041504 |
[4] | Wang Y, Yang X, Li NJ, et al. Leptomeningeal metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and treatment[J].Lung Cancer,2022,174: 1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.09.013. pmid:36206679 |
[5] | Li H, Zheng S, Lin Y, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetic and clinical activity of intrathecal chemotherapy with pemetrexed via the ommaya reservoir for leptomeningeal metastases from lung adenocarcinoma: a prospective phase Ⅰ study[J].Clin Lung Cancer,2023,24(2): e94-e104. DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2022.11.011. |
[6] | Le Rhun E, Weller M, Brandsma D, et al. EANO-ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours[J].Ann Oncol,2017,28(suppl_4): iv84-iv99. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdx221. |
[7] | Cao Y, Na W, Su H, et al. Subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by spontaneous intracranial hypotension: two rare cases report[J].Int J Neurosci,2023,133(1): 51-54. DOI:10.1080/00207454.2021.1881094. |
[8] | Volkov AA, Filis AK, Vrionis FD. Surgical treatment for leptome-ningeal disease[J].Cancer Control,2017,24(1): 47-53. DOI:10.1177/107327481702400107. |
[9] | Kim HS, Park JB, Gwak HS, et al. Clinical outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunts in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis[J].World J Surg Oncol,2019,17(1): 59. DOI:10.1186/s12957-019-1595-7. pmid:30917830 |
[10] | Lin N, Dunn IF, Glantz M, et al. Benefit of ventriculoperitoneal cerebrospinal fluid shunting and intrathecal chemotherapy in neoplastic meningitis: a retrospective, case-controlled study[J].J Neurosurg,2011,115(4): 730-736. DOI:10.3171/2011.5.JNS101768. pmid:21721878 |
[11] | Dai H, Chen Y, Elmquist WF. Distribution of the novel antifolate pemetrexed to the brain[J].J Pharmacol Exp Ther,2005,315(1): 222-229. DOI:10.1124/jpet.105.090043. pmid:15987831 |
[12] | Stapleton SL, Reid JM, Thompson PA, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed after intravenous administration in non-human primates[J].Cancer Chemother Pharmacol,2007,59(4): 461-466. DOI:10.1007/s00280-006-0285-7. |
[13] | Sun JM, Nam MH, Chung JY, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal administration of pemetrexed in rats[J].Cancer Chemother Pharmacol,2011,68(2): 531-538. DOI:10.1007/s00280-010-1522-7. |
[14] | Paris J, Angeli E, Bousquet G. The pharmacology of xenobiotics after intracerebro spinal fluid administration: implications for the treatment of brain tumors[J].Int J Mol Sci,2021,22(3): 1281. DOI:10.3390/ijms22031281. |
[15] | Vora A, Goulden N, Wade R, et al. Treatment reduction for children and young adults with low-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia defined by minimal residual disease (UKALL 2003): a randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2013, 14(3): 199-209. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70600-9. |
[16] | Fleischhack G, Jaehde U, Bode U. Pharmacokinetics following intraventricular administration of chemotherapy in patients with neoplastic meningitis[J].Clin Pharmacokinet,2005,44(1): 1-31. DOI:10.2165/00003088-200544010-00001. pmid:15634030 |
[17] | Palmisciano P, Watanabe G, Conching A, et al. Intrathecal therapy for the management of leptomeningeal metastatic disease: a scoping review of the current literature and ongoing clinical trials[J].J Neurooncol,2022,160(1): 79-100. DOI:10.1007/s11060-022-04118-0. |
[18] | Triarico S, Maurizi P, Mastrangelo S, et al. Improving the brain delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs in childhood brain tumors[J].Cancers (Basel),2019,11(6):824. DOI:10.3390/cancers11060824. |
[19] | Rollins NK. Using ADC to study the brain in early childhood: not for the uninitiated[J].Radiology,2021,298(2): 425-426. DOI:10.1148/radiol.2020204158. pmid:33290175 |
[20] | Pan Z, Yang G, Cui J, et al. A pilot phase 1 study of intrathecal pemetrexed for refractory leptomeningeal metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Front Oncol,2019,9: 838. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2019.00838. pmid:31544065 |
[21] | Pan Z, Yang G, He H, et al. Intrathecal pemetrexed combined with involved-field radiotherapy as a first-line intra-CSF therapy for leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: a phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ study[J].Ther Adv Med Oncol,2020,17(7): 12-17. DOI:10.1177/1758835920937953. |
[1] | 林永娟, 李会颖, 尹震宇, 郭爱斌, 谢宇.基于非靶标代谢组学的肺腺癌软脑膜转移患者脑脊液代谢特征研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 49(7): 390-399. |
[2] | 李杨仪, 龚龑, 谢丛华.SAMHD1抑制肺腺癌细胞中PD-L1表达的研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 49(11): 658-664. |
[3] | 周丽亚, 李小利, 曹子肖, 向俊馨, 刘佳慧, 夏雪梅, 李殿明.白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与培美曲塞分别联合顺铂治疗驱动基因阴性晚期肺腺癌的临床观察[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2021, 48(10): 596-601. |
[4] | 张贝, 王叶, 胡隽, 李妹, 王君, 穆允凤, 杨博.肺部转移性腺癌及鳞状细胞癌非典型MSCT多形性表现[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2021, 48(10): 591-595. |
[5] | 胡悦, 黄华兴, 华兴.NSCLC经培美曲塞+顺铂治疗转化为SCLC一例[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2020, 47(8): 505-507. |
[6] | 樊阳阳, 王影, 袁峰, 杜善平, 贺荣荣, 加燕.MALAT1靶向miR-142-3p在卵巢癌化疗耐药中的机制研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2020, 47(2): 82-89. |
[7] | 沈静侠, 韩彬, 王淑颖, 康海立, 王立东, 刘旭辉, 崔庆贵.替吉奥联合吉非替尼治疗EGFR-TKI获得性耐药晚期NSCLC的临床疗效[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 46(12): 723-727. |
[8] | 张帅, 艾斌.肺癌相关酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的药物相互作用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2016, 43(12): 935-939. |
[9] | 郭嘉漪, 章龙珍, 杨成喜.瘦素、雌激素及其受体与肺腺癌临床相关性研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2015, 42(8): 649-. |
[10] | 周静超,李娟,刘春生,周丁华,童卫杭,王丹.微透析技术在肿瘤中的应用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2014, 41(8): 570-573. |
[11] | 李军, 徐向英.培美曲塞在非小细胞肺癌治疗中的应用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2013, 40(2): 123-126. |
[12] | 季青.MALAT1、COX-2、β-catenin、MMP-3、MMP-9等基因在结直肠癌发生发展中的意义[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2012, 39(6): 477-480. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||