t=-3.959、-11.327,P<0.001);术后6个月微创组的骨性融合率为82.61%,明显高于开放组的35.00%,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=10.143,P<0.001);术后1年时两组患者全部形成骨性融合。术后6个月,两组患者AOFAS踝与后足功能评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1年微创组的AOFAS 评分为(77.55±5.70)分,开放组为(66.49±4.55)分,两组差异具有统计学意义(t=6.977,P<0.001)。结论 微创踝关节融合术治疗足踝严重创伤性关节炎更具优势,可以减轻术后疼痛、提高早期骨性融合率、加速恢复足踝功能,值得进一步开展基础和临床研究。","endNoteUrl_en":"http://xuebao.sdfmu.edu.cn/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=EndNote&id=18","reference":"[1] 张成昌,段小军,杨柳.微骨折技术应用于关节镜下踝关节融合术[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2019,27(6):481-486.
[2] 赵琳琳,马敬伟.踝关节融合术对足踝严重创伤性关节炎的治疗效果及预后分析[J].黑龙江科学,2018,9(5):106-107.
[3] 张春,刘娴.足踝严重创伤性关节炎治疗中踝关节融合术的应用价值分析[J].系统医学, 2020,5(1):100-102.
[4] 蔡培强,邵玉凯,蔡培素,等.微创踝关节融合术治疗足踝创伤性关节炎的疗效观察[J].骨科, 2017,8(1):16,24.
[5] 李刚,张鹏,王小武,等.关节镜辅助下内固定踝关节融合术与开放性踝关节融合术治疗晚期创伤性踝关节炎的疗效对比[J].广西医科大学学报,2017,34(11):1590-1593.
[6] 曲文庆,王振海,张俊勇,等.经外踝截骨螺钉固定的踝关节融合术治疗老年晚期踝关节炎[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97 (9):679-683.
[7] 陈先武,叶如卿,许海平,等.关节镜辅助踝关节清理、植骨融合治疗创伤后踝关节炎[J].浙江创伤外科,2015,22(2):370-372.
[8] 汪军,陈路.关节镜下踝关节融合术与人工全踝关节置换术治疗踝骨关节炎的随访研究[J].西部医学,2016,28(8):1125-1129.
[9] 周建波,唐康来,陶旭,等.经皮空心螺钉加压固定踝关节融合术[J].中华骨科杂志,2011,31(9):955-958.
[10] 孙振辉, 李楠, 张弢,等. 全踝关节置换术治疗晚期踝关节炎研究进展[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2018,32(10):1313-1316.
[11] Maffulli N, Longo UG, Locher J, et al. Outcome of ankle arthrodesis and ankle prosthesis: a review of the current status[J].Br Med Bull,2017,124(1): 91-112.
[12] 段小军,杨柳,彭旭,等.关节镜辅助踝关节融合术治疗晚期创伤性踝关节炎[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(4):403-408.
[13] 陈宏峰,李真,牛俊克等.微创踝关节融合术治疗创伤性踝关节炎患者的临床疗效分析[J].四川解剖学杂志,2020,12(28):78-79.
[14] 芦浩,袁玉松,徐海林等.经腓骨外侧入路性胫距跟关节融合术治疗胫距关节和距下关节病变[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(9):567-571.
[15] 马远.踝关节镜治疗创伤性踝关节炎的临床效果分析[J].中国伤残医学,2015,23(3):72-73.","bibtexUrl_cn":"//www.pitakata.com/xuebao/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=BibTeX&id=18","abstractUrl_en":"http://xuebao.sdfmu.edu.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2021.06.018","qi":"6","id":18,"nian":2021,"bianHao":"1629870993935-786137097","zuoZheEn_L":"Xu Dong","juanUrl_en":"http://xuebao.sdfmu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021","clcIndexList_en":[{"code":"R684","text":""}],"shouCiFaBuRiQi":"2021-08-25","qiShiYe":"460","received":"2020-12-15","qiUrl_cn":"http://xuebao.sdfmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V42/I6","lanMu_cn":"临床研究","pdfSize":"2783","zuoZhe_CN":"徐栋","risUrl_cn":"//www.pitakata.com/xuebao/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=Ris&id=18","title_cn":"微创踝关节融合术治疗足踝创伤性关节炎的临床价值","doi":"10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2021.06.018","jieShuYe":"462","keywordList_en":["athlete's foot","traumatic arthritis","arthroscopes","arthrodesis"],"endNoteUrl_cn":"//www.pitakata.com/xuebao/CN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=EndNote&id=18","zhaiyao_en":"Objective: To investigate the clinical value of arthroscope-assisted ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of traumatic arthritis of foot and ankle. Methods: From February 2017 to May 2019, retrospective analysis of the 43 cases of the clinical data of patients with severe traumatic ankle arthritis was made, 23 cases of ankle arthrodesis was performed arthroscopically (minimally invasive group), 20 patients who underwent open ankle arthrodesis (open group), and postoperative pain score difference of the day and 7 days, and osseous fusion rate after 6 months and 1 year and the differences between the AOFAS ankle function score were compared two groups of patients. Results: The pain scores of the minimally invasive group were (4.18±1.10) and (1.55±0.52) 1 and 7 days after surgery, which were both lower than those of the open group(5.54±1.15)and(3.45±0.58).The differences were statistically significant (t=-3.959,-11.327,P<0.001). The bone fusion rate of the minimally invasive group was 82.61% 6 months after surgery, which was significantly higher than that of the open group(35.00%).The difference was statistically significant (χ2=10.143, P<0.001). Bone fusion was formed in both groups at 1 year after surgery. Six months after surgery, there was no difference in AOFAS ankle function score between the two groups (P>0.05).AOFAS score was (77.55±5.70) in the minimally invasive group and (66.49±4.55) in the open group 1 year after surgery, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t=6.977, P<0.001). Conclusion: Minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis has more advantages in the treatment of severe traumatic arthritis of foot and ankle, which can reduce postoperative pain, improve the rate of early bone fusion and accelerate the recovery of foot and ankle function, which is worthy of further basic and clinical studies.","bibtexUrl_en":"http://xuebao.sdfmu.edu.cn/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=BibTeX&id=18","abstractUrl_cn":"http://xuebao.sdfmu.edu.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2021.06.018","zuoZheCn_L":"徐栋","juanUrl_cn":"http://xuebao.sdfmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021","lanMu_en":"Clinical Researches","clcIndexList_cn":[{"code":"R684","text":""}],"qiUrl_en":"//www.pitakata.com/xuebao/EN/Y2021/V42/I6","zuoZhe_EN":"Xu Dong","risUrl_en":"http://xuebao.sdfmu.edu.cn/EN/article/getTxtFile.do?fileType=Ris&id=18","title_en":"Clinical value of minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of traumatic ankle arthritis","hasPdf":"true"},"authorNotes_cn":["徐栋(1979—),男,山东宁阳人,主治医师,主要从事手足及显微外科工作。E-mail:xyd138548@163.com。"],"authorList_en":[{"deceased":false,"name_cn":"徐栋","name_en":"Xu Dong"}]}">

Clinical value of minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of traumatic ankle arthritis

Xu Dong

Journal of ShanDong First Medical University&ShanDong Academy of Medical Sciences››2021, Vol. 42››Issue (6): 460-462.

PDF(2783 KB)
PDF(2783 KB)
Journal of ShanDong First Medical University&ShanDong Academy of Medical Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 460-462. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2021.06.018
Clinical Researches

Clinical value of minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of traumatic ankle arthritis

  • Xu Dong
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of arthroscope-assisted ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of traumatic arthritis of foot and ankle. Methods: From February 2017 to May 2019, retrospective analysis of the 43 cases of the clinical data of patients with severe traumatic ankle arthritis was made, 23 cases of ankle arthrodesis was performed arthroscopically (minimally invasive group), 20 patients who underwent open ankle arthrodesis (open group), and postoperative pain score difference of the day and 7 days, and osseous fusion rate after 6 months and 1 year and the differences between the AOFAS ankle function score were compared two groups of patients. Results: The pain scores of the minimally invasive group were (4.18±1.10) and (1.55±0.52) 1 and 7 days after surgery, which were both lower than those of the open group(5.54±1.15)and(3.45±0.58).The differences were statistically significant ( t=-3.959,-11.327, P<0.001). The bone fusion rate of the minimally invasive group was 82.61% 6 months after surgery, which was significantly higher than that of the open group(35.00%).The difference was statistically significant ( χ 2=10.143, P<0.001). Bone fusion was formed in both groups at 1 year after surgery. Six months after surgery, there was no difference in AOFAS ankle function score between the two groups ( P>0.05).AOFAS score was (77.55±5.70) in the minimally invasive group and (66.49±4.55) in the open group 1 year after surgery, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant( t=6.977, P<0.001). Conclusion: Minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis has more advantages in the treatment of severe traumatic arthritis of foot and ankle, which can reduce postoperative pain, improve the rate of early bone fusion and accelerate the recovery of foot and ankle function, which is worthy of further basic and clinical studies.

Key words

athlete's foot/traumatic arthritis/arthroscopes/arthrodesis

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xu Dong.Clinical value of minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of traumatic ankle arthritis[J]. Journal of ShanDong First Medical University&ShanDong Academy of Medical Sciences. 2021, 42(6): 460-462 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2021.06.018

References

[1] 张成昌,段小军,杨柳.微骨折技术应用于关节镜下踝关节融合术[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2019,27(6):481-486.
[2] 赵琳琳,马敬伟.踝关节融合术对足踝严重创伤性关节炎的治疗效果及预后分析[J].黑龙江科学,2018,9(5):106-107.
[3] 张春,刘娴.足踝严重创伤性关节炎治疗中踝关节融合术的应用价值分析[J].系统医学, 2020,5(1):100-102.
[4] 蔡培强,邵玉凯,蔡培素,等.微创踝关节融合术治疗足踝创伤性关节炎的疗效观察[J].骨科, 2017,8(1):16,24.
[5] 李刚,张鹏,王小武,等.关节镜辅助下内固定踝关节融合术与开放性踝关节融合术治疗晚期创伤性踝关节炎的疗效对比[J].广西医科大学学报,2017,34(11):1590-1593.
[6] 曲文庆,王振海,张俊勇,等.经外踝截骨螺钉固定的踝关节融合术治疗老年晚期踝关节炎[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97 (9):679-683.
[7] 陈先武,叶如卿,许海平,等.关节镜辅助踝关节清理、植骨融合治疗创伤后踝关节炎[J].浙江创伤外科,2015,22(2):370-372.
[8] 汪军,陈路.关节镜下踝关节融合术与人工全踝关节置换术治疗踝骨关节炎的随访研究[J].西部医学,2016,28(8):1125-1129.
[9] 周建波,唐康来,陶旭,等.经皮空心螺钉加压固定踝关节融合术[J].中华骨科杂志,2011,31(9):955-958.
[10] 孙振辉, 李楠, 张弢,等. 全踝关节置换术治疗晚期踝关节炎研究进展[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2018,32(10):1313-1316.
[11] Maffulli N, Longo UG, Locher J, et al. Outcome of ankle arthrodesis and ankle prosthesis: a review of the current status[J].Br Med Bull,2017,124(1): 91-112.
[12] 段小军,杨柳,彭旭,等.关节镜辅助踝关节融合术治疗晚期创伤性踝关节炎[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(4):403-408.
[13] 陈宏峰,李真,牛俊克等.微创踝关节融合术治疗创伤性踝关节炎患者的临床疗效分析[J].四川解剖学杂志,2020,12(28):78-79.
[14] 芦浩,袁玉松,徐海林等.经腓骨外侧入路性胫距跟关节融合术治疗胫距关节和距下关节病变[J].中华骨科杂志,2019,39(9):567-571.
[15] 马远.踝关节镜治疗创伤性踝关节炎的临床效果分析[J].中国伤残医学,2015,23(3):72-73.
PDF(2783 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/