betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 675-679.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2021.09.008

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    

外周血NLR、PLR、SII在甲状腺结节中的诊断价值

房忠卫1(), 周宪伟1, 曹志强1, 宋艳芳2, 任更朴1   

  1. 1.聊城市第二人民医院,检验科,山东 聊城 252600
    2.聊城市第二人民医院,病理科,山东 聊城 252600
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-18 出版日期:2021-10-13 发布日期:2021-10-13
  • 作者简介:房忠卫, 硕士, 主管技师, 研究方向:临检与肿瘤, E-mail: fangzhw110@163.com

The diagnostic value of peripheral blood NLR, PLR and SII in thyroid nodules

Zhongwei Fang1(), Xianwei Zhou1, Zhiqiang Cao1, Yanfang Song2, Gengpu Ren1   

  1. 1.Department of Cinical Laboratory, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng,Liaocheng 252600,China
    2.Department of Pathology, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng,Liaocheng 252600,China
  • Received:2021-02-18 Online:2021-10-13 Published:2021-10-13

摘要: 目的

探讨外周血中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)以及系统性免疫性炎症指数(SII)在健康人群,甲状腺良性、恶性结节间的鉴别诊断价值。

方法

选取2017年1月至2019年10月在聊城市第二人民医院确诊的172例甲状腺良性结节及285例恶性结节患者作为研究对象,选取同期该院健康查体199例患者作为对照组,记录术前外周血中性粒细胞计数、淋巴细胞计数以及血小板计数,并计算NLR、PLR、SII,用t检验比较NLR、PLR、SII在健康人群组、良性结节组、恶性结节组间的差异,用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)确定NLR、PLR、SII在不同组别中鉴别的临界值。

结果

除NLR和SII在良恶性结节组比较中差异无统计学意义外,三项指标(NLR、PLR、SII)在其他三组两两比较中,差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。AUC面积在0.72~0.8之间。NLR、PLR、SII检测在健康人群与良性甲状腺结节人群鉴别中灵敏度分别为85.9%,92.5%,81.9%,在健康人群与甲状腺恶性结节组鉴别中灵敏度分别为70.4%,81.9%,74.1%,在良性结节组与恶性结节组的鉴别特异度分别为85.6%、69.5%,83.2%,差异具有统计学意义。

结论

NLR、PLR、SII检测对健康人群与良性结节组以及健康人群与甲状腺结节组具有一定的鉴别价值,对良性结节与恶性结节的鉴别意义不明显。

关键词: 甲状腺结节, NLR, PLR, SII, 鉴别诊断

Abstract: Objective

To investigate the values of the differential diagnosis of peripheral blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in healthy people, benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Methods

172 patients with benign thyroid nodules and 285 patients with malignant nodules diagnosed in the Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng from January 2017 to October 2019 were selected as the research objects, and 199 patients with health examinations in the hospital during the same period were selected as the control group, the preoperative peripheral blood neutrophil count, lymphocyte count and platelet count were recorded, and NLR, PLR and SII were calculated, and NLR, PLR and SII in healthy people, benign nodules, and malignant nodules were compared by t test for the difference between groups, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to determine the critical values of NLR, PLR, and SII in different groups.

Results

Except that there was no statistically significant difference between NLR and SII in the comparison of benign and malignant nodules (group A vs group B), the three indicators (NLR, PLR, SII) in the other three groups were compared with each other, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The area of AUC was between 0.72 and 0.8. The sensitivity of NLR, PLR, and SII in the identification of healthy people and benign thyroid nodules was 85.9%, 92.5%, and 81.9% respectively. In the detection of healthy people and malignant thyroid nodules, the sensitivity in the discrimination was 70.4%, 81.9%, and 74.1%, respectively. The discrimination specificities in the benign nodule group and the malignant nodule group were 85.6%, 69.5%, and 83.2%, respectively, and the significance was significant.

Conclusion

The detection of NLR, PLR, and SII has a certain value to distinguish between healthy people and benign nodules and healthy people and thyroid nodules, but it is not significant to distinguish between benign and malignant nodules.

Key words: thyroid nodules, NLR, PLR, SII, differential diagnosis

中图分类号: