Effect of perception control and self-management on cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients with chemotherapy

Abstract

Abstract:

ObjectiveTo understand the status quo of perception control, self-management and cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and to investigate the impacts of perception control and self-management on CRF.MethodsIn this study, 246 breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy from Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were investigated by means of cross-sectional survey. Cancer experience and efficiency scale was used to evaluate the patients' perception control; cancer patients' self-management scale was used to assess their self-management; and Piper Fatigue Scale was used to evaluate their CRF. Finally, the scores of CRF among the patients with different demographic data were compared, and the effects of perception control and self-management behavior on CRF were analyzed.ResultsIn univariate analysis, there were statistically significant differences of CRF scores resulting from different educational backgrounds (F=3.392, P=0.019), sources of medical cost (F=4.368,P=0.005), disease stages (F=4.376,P=0.005), chemotherapy periods (F=3.865,P=0.010) and courses of disease (F=3.094,P=0.028). The differences in each dimension of perceived control cancer experience (F=7.248, P=0.001), control efficacy (F=96.595,P<0.001), self-management level of cancer patients (F=65.009,P<0.001) and CRF (F=130.973,P<0.001) were statistically significant. Cancer experience in perception control was positively correlated with CRF (r=0.467,P<0.001); control effectiveness and self-management of cancer patients were negatively correlated with CRF (r=-0.505,P<0.001;r=-0.564,P<0.001). Multiple linear regression showed that source of medical expenses (setting commercial insurance as the reference group), chemotherapy cycle (setting chemotherapy cycle ≥ 6 cycles as the reference group), cancer experience, control effectiveness, and self-management were entered in regression models, which could explain 55.5% of the total variation in CRF scores, and there was a significant linear relationship (F=17.100,P<0.001).ConclusionMedical staff should focus on CRF in patients at their own expense and in the 2-5 chemotherapy cycles. Cancer experience is positively correlated with CRF. Control effectiveness and self-management behavior are negatively correlated with CRF.

Key words:Breast neoplasms,Fatigue,Analysis of influence factor,Perception control

Li Ranran, Yang Fuguo, Fan Min, Huang Wei, Yuan Fang. Effect of perception control and self-management on cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients with chemotherapy[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2020, 47(1): 18-23.

Figures/Tables4

项目	例(%)		评分( $x ?$ ±s)		t/F值		P值
年龄(岁)
18~30	23(9.3)		5.22±0.76
31~40	71(28.9)		5.13±0.71
41~50	80(32.5)		5.11±0.76		0.250		0.910
51~60	60(24.4)		5.20±0.65
>60	12(4.9)		5.08±0.82
民族
汉族	231(93.9)		5.15±0.72		0.216		0.829
其他	15(6.1)		5.11±0.64
婚姻状况
未婚	17(6.9)		5.18±0.70
已婚	186(75.6)		5.18±0.72		0.940		0.392
离异或丧偶	43(17.5)		5.01±0.70
文化程度
小学	20(8.1)		5.40±0.62^a
初中	78(31.7)		5.23±0.72^a		3.392		0.019
高中/中专	96(39.0)		4.98±0.67
大学及以上	52(21.1)		5.25±0.78^a
居住地区
城市	145(58.9)		5.08±0.70		1.890		0.060
农村	101(41.1)		5.25±0.74
职业
工人	29(11.8)		5.05±0.56
农民	54(22.0)		5.19±0.80
公务员	11(4.5)		5.47±0.90		1.792		0.115
职工	80(32.5)		5.19±0.72
自由择业者	54(22.0)		5.16±0.67
退休	18(7.3)		4.75±0.66
医疗费用来源
自费	8(3.3)		5.81±0.54^b
职工医保	76(30.9)		5.17±0.63^bc		4.368		0.005
居民医保	113(45.9)		5.20±0.78^bc
商业保险(含同时载有居民/职工医保)	49(19.9)		4.86±0.65
家庭月收入(元)
≤1 000	3(1.2)		5.51±0.37
1 001~3 000	63(25.6)		5.07±0.70		1.904		0.130
3 001~6 000	111(45.1)		5.08±0.73
>6 000	69(28.0)		5.30±0.71
病理类型
浸润性导管癌	225(91.5)		5.13±0.73		-0.604		0.546
非浸润性导管癌	21(8.5)		5.24±0.61
项目		例(%)		评分( $x ?$ ±s)		t/F值	P值
疾病分期
Ⅰ期		10(4.1)		4.82±0.65^d
Ⅱ期		57(23.2)		5.92±0.71^de		4.376	0.005
Ⅲ期		106(43.1)		5.17±0.70
Ⅳ期		73(29.7)		5.33±0.72
化疗方案
AC-T(H)或TAC(H)		136(55.3)		5.11±0.75
TC(H)		24(9.8)		5.33±0.60		0.810	0.490
TX或NP		74(30.1)		5.13±0.71
其他		12(4.9)		5.30±0.63
化疗周期
1周期		24(9.8)		4.93±0.60^fg
2~3周期		38(15.4)		5.41±0.73		3.865	0.010
4~5周期		76(30.9)		5.29±0.65
≥6周期		108(43.9)		5.00±0.74^fg
病程
≤1年		98(39.8)		5.09±0.78^h
>1年且≤3年		36(14.6)		4.95±0.61^h		3.094	0.028
>3年且≤5年		52(21.1)		5.38±0.63
>5年		60(24.4)		5.16±0.70

项目	各维度评分	各条目评分	F值	P值
癌症经验	59.85±7.10	3.74±0.44
个人经验	15.30±2.43	3.83±0.61^a
社会经验	23.18±3.16	3.86±0.53^a	7.248	0.001
情绪经验	22.03±3.72	3.67±0.62
控制效能	47.25±4.79	3.63±0.37
个人效能	16.70±2.72	3.34±0.54^bc
集体效能	18.57±2.22	3.71±0.44^c	96.595	<0.001
医护效能	12.00±1.73	4.00±0.58^b
自我管理	152.26±6.67	3.46±0.15
日常生活管理	35.63±3.76	3.24±0.34^defg
症状管理	25.45±2.93	3.64±0.42^egh
情绪管理	29.29±3.90	3.25±0.43^efg	65.009	<0.001
与医护人员沟通	15.53±2.42	3.88±0.61^eg
信息管理	11.07±1.98	3.69±0.66^g
自我管理效能感	35.29±4.24	3.53±0.42
CRF	5.14±0.72	5.14±0.72
行为/严重维度	6.00±0.79	6.00±0.79^ijk
情感维度	4.62±1.14	4.62±1.14^jk	130.973	<0.001
感知维度	5.42±0.87	5.42±0.87^k
认知维度	4.55±0.96	4.55±0.96

项目	CRF		行为/严重维度		情感维度		感知维度		认知维度
癌症经验	0.467	<0.001	0.313	<0.001	0.344	<0.001	0.424	<0.001	0.347	<0.001
控制效能	-0.505	<0.001	-0.301	<0.001	-0.341	<0.001	-0.495	<0.001	-0.408	<0.001
自我管理	-0.564	<0.001	-0.371	<0.001	-0.503	<0.001	-0.433	<0.001	-0.392	<0.001

项目	B值	SE值	β值	t值	P值
(常量)	11.748	1.006	-	11.676	<0.001
文化程度(小学)	0.164	0.130	0.063	1.259	0.209
文化程度(初中)	-0.034	0.091	-0.022	-0.372	0.710
文化程度(高中/中专)	-0.113	0.087	-0.077	-1.297	0.196
居住地(城市)	-0.013	0.066	-0.009	-0.194	0.846
医疗费用来源(自费)	0.595	0.194	0.147	3.069	0.002
医疗费用来源(职工医保)	0.063	0.096	0.040	0.655	0.513
医疗费用来源(居民医保)	0.087	0.094	0.061	0.933	0.352
疾病分期(Ⅱ期)	-0.055	0.182	-0.032	-0.301	0.764
疾病分期(Ⅲ期)	0.039	0.170	0.027	0.231	0.818
疾病分期(Ⅳ期)	0.042	0.173	0.027	0.243	0.809
化疗周期(1周期)	0.190	0.114	0.079	1.667	0.097
化疗周期(2~3周期)	0.232	0.096	0.117	2.423	0.016
化疗周期(4~5周期)	0.241	0.073	0.157	3.323	0.001
病程(>1年且≤3年)	-0.160	0.097	-0.079	-1.647	0.101
病程(>3年且≤5年)	0.033	0.093	0.019	0.357	0.722
病程(>5年)	-0.089	0.089	-0.054	-1.005	0.316
癌症经验	0.026	0.005	0.254	5.318	<0.001
控制效能	-0.045	0.007	-0.300	-6.203	<0.001
自我管理	-0.039	0.005	-0.366	-7.450	<0.001

References18

[1]	林红, 张鑫, 刘蕾 . 乳腺癌癌因性疲乏护理现状及进展[J]. 沈阳医学院学报, 2012,14(04):244-245. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2344.2012.04.022.
[2]	Berger AM, Mooney K, Alvarez-Perez A , et al. Cancer-related fatigue, version 2.2015[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2015,13(8):1012-1039. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0122.
[3]	杨军, 李新霞, 张爱华 . 乳腺癌患者自我管理行为与癌性疲乏及生存质量的相关研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2017,32(2):99-102. DOI: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2017.02.002.
[4]	高伟娟 . 控制感的心理学理解——控制感研究述评[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2005.
[5]	Hou WK . Intrapersonal and interpersonal dimensions of cancer perception: a confirmatory factor analysis of the cancer experience and efficacy scale (CEES)[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2010,18(5):561-571. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-009-0687-2.
[6]	程玲灵 . 癌症患者自我管理测评量表的构建及信效度检验[D]. 唐山: 华北理工大学, 2017.
[7]	叶艳胜, 鲍翠玉, 李莉 . 低年资护士生涯适应力与时间管理倾向的关系研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2015,30(5):69-70, 83. DOI: 10.3870/hlxzz.2015.05.069.
[8]	谭杏, 黄丽芳, 孙彩霞 , 等. 肺癌化疗患者感知控制水平现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2016,32(29):2258-2262. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2016.29.005.
[9]	So WK, Dodgson J, Tai JW . Fatigue and quality of life among Chinese patients with hematologic malignancy after bone marrow transplantation[J]. Cancer Nurs, 2003, 26(3): 211-219, quiz 220-221. DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200306000-00006.
[10]	刘芳, 姜文彬, 闫琪 , 等. 乳腺癌术后辅助化疗患者癌因性疲乏与社会支持相关性的研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2013,13(4):235-237. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-315X.2013.04.003.
[11]	王梅芳, 姚晚侠 . 康复期乳腺癌癌因性疲乏及影响因素的纵向研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2017,33(9):651-657. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2017.09.003.
[12]	何明珠 . 肿瘤化疗患者癌因性疲乏状况及其影响因素的研究[D]. 石河子市: 石河子大学, 2015.
[13]	杜富秀 . 乳腺癌术后辅助化疗患者癌因性疲乏及影响因素的研究[D]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学, 2007.
[14]	张毅 . 第41届美国圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会重要研究进展解析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2019,13(3):129-136. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2019.03.001.
[15]	陈树珍 . 稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者认知功能水平和影响因素分析及护理干预措施[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2019,16(20):57-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2019.20.022.
[16]	张丽娣, 李乐之 . 慢性病感知控制研究现状及展望[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014,49(1):91-94. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2014.01.023.
[17]	马波, 王海丽, 李波 . 乳腺癌患者自我感受负担与自我管理行为的相关性研究[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2016,27(3):191-192. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2016.03.024.
[18]	韦燕萍, 高铭云, 吴庆珍 . 恶性肿瘤患者自我管理的研究现状及进展[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2016,13(2):31-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2016.02.014.