国际肿瘤学杂志››2022,Vol. 49››Issue (8): 464-472.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20220524-00090
吴浦嫄1, 祁亮1, 王涛2, 史敏科2, 孙雨薇1, 王立峰1, 刘宝瑞1, 闫婧1, 任伟1()
收稿日期:
2022-05-24修回日期:
2022-07-09出版日期:
2022-08-08发布日期:
2022-09-21通讯作者:
任伟 E-mail:renwei@njglyy.com基金资助:
Wu Puyuan1, Qi Liang1, Wang Tao2, Shi Minke2, Sun Yuwei1, Wang Lifeng1, Liu Baorui1, Yan Jing1, Ren Wei1()
Received:
2022-05-24Revised:
2022-07-09Online:
2022-08-08Published:
2022-09-21Contact:
Ren Wei E-mail:renwei@njglyy.comSupported by:
摘要:
目的分析食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者采用基于术后高频复发区域改良的临床靶区(CTV)进行术后放疗(PORT)的生存疗效、预后影响因素及失败模式,为进一步优化PORT的CTV提供参考。方法回顾性分析2014年4月28日至2018年11月29日在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院肿瘤中心治疗的ESCC根治术后患者,纳入其中的pT3-4aN0或N+、并采用基于术后高频复发区域改良的CTV进行PORT的患者。Kaplan-Meier法计算总生存期(OS)、无局部区域复发生存期(LRFS),评价患者的不良反应,Cox比例风险模型行单因素和多因素生存分析,并分析PORT的失败模式。结果本研究共纳入85例患者,中位随访52.6个月,全组中位OS为74.1个月,1年、2年和3年OS率分别为97.6%、84.7%和71.7%;中位LRFS未达到,1年、2年和3年LRFS率分别为92.9%、78.6%和71.5%;3~4级不良反应发生率为17.6%(15/85),主要为淋巴细胞计数减少、骨髓抑制、消化道反应和皮肤反应。PORT后OS的单因素分析提示,分化程度(将G1+G1~2+G2分组设为对照组,G2~3+G3分组:HR=4.19,95%CI为1.91~9.17,P<0.001;NA+基底细胞样分组:HR=4.16,95%CI为1.29~13.44,P=0.017)及术后分期(HR=2.19,95%CI为1.09~4.39,P=0.030)为OS的影响因素;Cox多因素分析表明,分化程度是影响PORT后OS的独立预后因素(将G1+G1~2+G2分组设为对照组,G2~3+G3分组:HR=5.24,95%CI为2.30~11.93,P<0.001;NA+基底细胞样分组:HR=4.83,95%CI为1.33~17.62,P=0.017)。首次失败模式分析显示,39例(45.9%)出现复发,22例(25.9%)为局部区域复发,中位复发时间为术后15.2个月,19例(22.4%)出现远处转移,中位复发时间为术后14.1个月,其中2例(2.4%)为混合型失败;在局部区域复发中,16例(72.7%)为放射野内复发,部位以锁骨上、上中纵隔和上腹部胃周/腹腔动脉干淋巴引流区最常见;在远处转移中,肺、骨与肝转移最常见。结论对于根治术后高危ESCC患者,采用基于术后高频复发区域改良的CTV进行PORT,生存期佳,安全性高,值得开展多中心、大样本、前瞻性研究进一步证实。
吴浦嫄, 祁亮, 王涛, 史敏科, 孙雨薇, 王立峰, 刘宝瑞, 闫婧, 任伟. 基于高频复发区改良临床靶区的术后放疗在食管鳞状细胞癌中的疗效研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 49(8): 464-472.
Wu Puyuan, Qi Liang, Wang Tao, Shi Minke, Sun Yuwei, Wang Lifeng, Liu Baorui, Yan Jing, Ren Wei. Efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy based on modified clinical target volume according to high-frequency recurrence regions in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2022, 49(8): 464-472.
图1
食管鳞状细胞癌根治术后pT3-4aN0或N+患者进行PORT时,采用基于术后高频复发区域的改良CTV和PTV示意图 A为术后病理示胃贲门旁、胃左或胃周淋巴结阴性时CTV和PTV的冠状面图;B为矢状面图,CTV呈“Y”型野,覆盖双侧锁骨上区、2、4、7区淋巴引流区;C为术后病理示胃贲门旁、胃左或胃周淋巴结阳性时CTV和PTV的冠状面图;D为矢状面图,CTV呈“Y+1”型野,CTV在“Y”型野的基础上增加16~17、20区淋巴引流区;PTV为CTV外扩0.5~0.8 cm,并根据正常组织进行修整 注:PORT为术后放疗;CTV为临床靶区;PTV为计划靶区;蓝色实线为CTV,绿色实线为PTV"
表1
85例采用基于高频复发区的改良CTV进行PORT的食管鳞状细胞癌患者基线特征"
临床特征 | 例数 | 百分比(%) |
---|---|---|
年龄(岁) | ||
≤65 | 58 | 68.2 |
>65 | 27 | 31.8 |
性别 | ||
男 | 71 | 83.5 |
女 | 14 | 16.5 |
分化程度 | ||
G1 | 6 | 7.1 |
G1~2 | 15 | 17.6 |
G2 | 28 | 32.9 |
G2~3 | 25 | 29.4 |
G3 | 7 | 8.2 |
基底细胞样 | 1 | 1.2 |
NA | 3 | 3.6 |
术后分期(AJCC第8版) | ||
ⅡA | 8 | 9.4 |
ⅡB | 31 | 36.5 |
ⅢA | 10 | 11.8 |
ⅢB | 34 | 39.9 |
ⅣA | 2 | 2.4 |
T分期 | ||
T1 | 8 | 9.4 |
T2 | 10 | 11.8 |
T3 | 67 | 78.8 |
T4 | 0 | 0 |
N分期 | ||
N0 | 34 | 39.9 |
N1 | 36 | 42.4 |
N2 | 13 | 15.3 |
N3 | 2 | 2.4 |
原发肿瘤位置 | ||
颈段 | 1 | 1.2 |
胸上段 | 2 | 2.4 |
胸中段 | 51 | 59.9 |
胸下段 | 31 | 36.5 |
辅助放疗剂量(Gy) | ||
<45 | 15 | 17.6 |
≥45 | 70 | 82.4 |
表2
85例食管鳞状细胞癌患者采用基于高频复发区的改良CTV进行PORT后OS的影响因素分析"
影响因素 | 单因素分析 | 多因素分析 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P值 | HR值 | 95%CI | P值 | HR值 | 95%CI | ||
年龄(≤65岁/>65岁) | 0.105 | 0.49 | 0.23~1.03 | 0.074 | 0.43 | 0.17~1.09 | |
性别(男性/女性) | 0.275 | 0.57 | 0.24~1.35 | 0.553 | 0.72 | 0.24~2.15 | |
原发肿瘤位置 | |||||||
颈段+胸上段 | 0.980 | 0.00 | 0.00~NE | 0.981 | 0.00 | 0.00~NE | |
胸中段 | 0.770 | 0.53 | 0.27~1.07 | 0.023 | 0.40 | 0.18~0.88 | |
胸下段 | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | |
分化程度 | |||||||
G1+G1~2+G2 | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | |
G2~3+G3 | <0.001 | 4.19 | 1.91~9.17 | <0.001 | 5.24 | 2.30~11.93 | |
NA+基底细胞样 | 0.017 | 4.16 | 1.29~13.44 | 0.017 | 4.83 | 1.33~17.62 | |
术后分期(Ⅱ期/Ⅲ+ⅣA期) | 0.030 | 2.19 | 1.09~4.39 | 0.736 | 1.14 | 0.53~2.43 |
表3
85例食管鳞状细胞癌患者采用基于高频复发区的改良CTV进行PORT后首次失败情况分析"
失败情况 | 例数 | 发生率(%) | 失败情况 | 例数 | 发生率(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
复发类型 | 局部区域复发与放射野关系 | ||||
局部区域复发 | 22 | 25.9 | 放射野内 | 16 | 18.8 |
远处转移 | 19 | 22.4 | 放射野外 | 5 | 5.9 |
混合型 | 2 | 2.4 | 边缘型 | 1 | 1.2 |
局部区域复发位置 | 远处转移位置 | ||||
锁骨上 | 3 | 3.5 | 颈部区域外淋巴结 | 1 | 1.2 |
上中纵隔 | 10 | 11.8 | 肺 | 10 | 11.8 |
锁骨上+上中纵隔 | 1 | 1.2 | 骨 | 3 | 3.4 |
下纵隔 | 2 | 2.4 | 肝 | 2 | 2.4 |
瘤床 | 0 | 0 | 肺+肝 | 1 | 1.2 |
吻合口 | 0 | 0 | 骨+肝 | 2 | 2.4 |
上腹部胃周/腹腔干 | 6 | 7.0 |
[1] | Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. doi:10.3322/caac.21660 |
[2] | Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(7): 783-791. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474 |
[3] | Zhang X, Wang Y, Meng L. Comparative genomic analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: new opportunities towards molecularly targeted therapy[J]. Acta Pharm Sin B, 2022, 12(3): 1054-1067. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.09.028. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.09.028pmid:35530133 |
[4] | Eyck BM, Hulshof MCCM, et al. Ten-year outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: the randomized controlled CROSS trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(18): 1995-2004. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.03614. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.03614 |
[5] | Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): a phase Ⅲ multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(27): 2796-2803. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483 |
[6] | Cai XW, Zeng Y, Feng W, et al. Randomized phase Ⅱ trial comparing tumor bed alone with tumor bed and elective nodal postoperative radiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2019, 32(12): doz013. DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz013. doi:10.1093/dote/doz013 |
[7] | Zhang X, Yang X, Ni J, et al. Recommendation for the definition of postoperative radiotherapy target volume based on a pooled analysis of patterns of failure after radical surgery among patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2018, 13(1): 255. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1199-3. doi:10.1186/s13014-018-1199-3 |
[8] | 中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会, 中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤放射治疗专业委员会. 中国食管癌放射治疗指南(2021年版)[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 12-25. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20211021-00002. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20211021-00002 |
[9] | Schreiber D, Rineer J, Vongtama D, et al. Impact of postoperative radiation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2010, 5(2): 244-250. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181c5e34f. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181c5e34fpmid:20009774 |
[10] | Xiao ZF, Yang ZY, Liang J, et al. Value of radiotherapy after radical surgery for esophageal carcinoma: a report of 495 patients[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003, 75(2): 331-336. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04401-6. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04401-6pmid:12607634 |
[11] | Xiao ZF, Yang ZY, Miao YJ, et al. Influence of number of metastatic lymph nodes on survival of curative resected thoracic esophageal cancer patients and value of radiotherapy: report of 549 cases[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005, 62(1): 82-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.046. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.046 |
[12] | Chen J, Pan J, Zheng X, et al. Number and location of positive nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and survival after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012, 82(1): 475-482. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037 |
[13] | Xu Y, Liu J, Du X, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative radiation in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy for pathologic lymph node positive esophageal cancer[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2013, 8: 116. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-116. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-8-116 |
[14] | Zhang W, Liu X, Xiao Z, et al. Postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy improved survival in lymph node-positive or stage Ⅲ thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Oncol Res Treat, 2015, 38(3): 97-102. DOI: 10.1159/000375391. doi:10.1159/000375391 |
[15] | Chen SB, Weng HR, Wang G, et al. The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on radically resected T3esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2016, 142(1): 277-286. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2041-z. doi:10.1007/s00432-015-2041-z |
[16] | Yu J, Ouyang W, Li C, et al. Mapping patterns of metastatic lymph nodes for postoperative radiotherapy in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a recommendation for clinical target volume definition[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1): 927. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6065-7. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6065-7 |
[17] | Liu Q, Cai XW, Wu B, et al. Patterns of failure after radical surgery among patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: implications for the clinical target volume design of post-operative radiotherapy[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(5): e97225. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097225. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097225 |
[18] | Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2017, 12(1): 36-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.016. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.016 |
[19] | Freites-Martinez A, Santana N, Arias-Santiago S, et al. Using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE-version 5.0) to evaluate the severity of adverse events of anticancer therapies[J]. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed), 2021, 112(1): 90-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009 |
[20] | Mayanagi S, Irino T, Kawakubo H, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment strategy for locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2019, 3(3): 269-275. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12243. doi:10.1002/ags3.12243pmid:31131355 |
[21] | Ni W, Yu S, Xiao Z, et al. Postoperative adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone for stage ⅡB-Ⅲ esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase Ⅲ randomized controlled trial[J]. Oncologist, 2021, 26(12): e2151-e2160. DOI: 10.1002/onco.13914. doi:10.1002/onco.13914 |
[22] | Deng W, Yang J, Ni W, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in pa-thological T2-3N0M0thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: interim report of a prospective, phase Ⅲ, randomized controlled study[J]. Oncologist, 2020, 25(4): e701-e708. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0276. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0276 |
[23] | Li J, Qiu R, Hu Y, et al. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with pN+ esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021: 8571438. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8571438. doi:10.1155/2021/8571438 |
[24] | Wang Q, Lang J, Li T, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2020, 15(1): 119. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01557-9. doi:10.1186/s13014-020-01557-9 |
[25] | Zhang X, Yang Y, Sun Y, et al. Adjuvant therapy for pathological T3N0M0esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(6): 2512-2522. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.70. doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.05.70 |
[26] | Zhang Z, Xu L, Di X, et al. A retrospective study of postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2019, 8(5): 708-716. DOI: 10.21037/apm.2019.11.19. doi:10.21037/apm.2019.11.19 |
[27] | Chen D, Patel RR, Verma V, et al. Interaction between lymphopenia, radiotherapy technique, dosimetry, and survival outcomes in lung cancer patients receiving combined immunotherapy and radiotherapy[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2020, 150: 114-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.051. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.051 |
[28] | Davuluri R, Jiang W, Fang P, et al. Lymphocyte nadir and esophageal cancer survival outcomes after chemoradiation therapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2017, 99(1): 128-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.037. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.037 |
[29] | Liu J, Cai X, Liu Q, et al. Characteristics of the local recurrence pattern after curative resection and values in target region delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2017, 8(6): 630-633. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12499. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12499 |
[30] | Zhang X, Ai D, Wang J, et al. The prognosis and feasibility of extensive clinical target volume in postoperative radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase Ⅱ clinical trial[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 669575. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.669575. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.669575 |
[31] | Cui T, Zhang H, Yu T, et al. Pattern of recurrence in 428 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical surgery and its implication in postoperative radiotherapeutic clinical target volume[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 652365. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652365. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.652365 |
[32] | Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021, 384(13): 1191-1203. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032125. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2032125 |
[1] | 钱晓涛, 石子宜, 胡格, 吴晓维.Ⅲ~ⅣA期食管鳞状细胞癌放化疗后行巩固化疗的疗效:一项真实世界临床研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 326-331. |
[2] | 杨蜜, 别俊, 张加勇, 邓佳秀, 唐组阁, 卢俊.局部晚期可切除食管癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后分析[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 332-337. |
[3] | 陈红健, 张素青.血清miR-24-3p、H2AFX与肝癌患者临床病理特征及术后复发的关系研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 344-349. |
[4] | 范志鹏, 余静, 胡静, 廖正凯, 徐禹, 欧阳雯, 谢丛华.炎症标志物的变化趋势对一线接受免疫联合化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的预测价值[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(5): 257-266. |
[5] | 刘静, 刘芹, 黄梅.基于SMOTE算法的食管癌放化疗患者肺部感染的预后模型构建[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(5): 267-273. |
[6] | 杨琳, 路宁, 温华, 张明鑫, 朱琳.炎症负荷指数与胃癌临床关系研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(5): 274-279. |
[7] | 刘萍萍, 何学芳, 张翼, 杨旭, 张珊珊, 季一飞.原发性脑胶质瘤患者术后复发危险因素及预测模型构建[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 193-197. |
[8] | 万芳, 杨钢, 李睿, 万启晶.食管癌患者血清miR-497、miR-383水平及临床意义[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 204-209. |
[9] | 姚益新, 沈煜霖.血清SOCS3、TXNIP水平对肝细胞癌TACE治疗预后的预测价值[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 217-222. |
[10] | 孙维蔚, 姚学敏, 王鹏健, 王静, 贾敬好.基于血液学指标探讨免疫治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌预后因素及列线图构建[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 143-150. |
[11] | 刘玉兰, 井海燕, 孙静, 宋伟, 沙丹.胃癌免疫治疗疗效预测及预后标志物的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 175-180. |
[12] | 彭琴, 蔡玉婷, 王伟.KPNA2在肝癌中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 181-185. |
[13] | 陈波光, 王苏贵, 张永杰.血清胆碱酯酶与炎症标志物在ⅠA~ⅢA期乳腺癌预后中的作用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(2): 73-82. |
[14] | 金旭东, 陈忠坚, 毛伟敏.MTAP基因在恶性间皮瘤中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(2): 99-104. |
[15] | 中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会, 中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤放射治疗专业委员会.中国食管癌放射治疗指南(2023年版)[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 1-20. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||