国际肿瘤学杂志››2020,Vol. 47››Issue (1): 10-17.doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2020.01.002
收稿日期:
2019-11-26修回日期:
2019-12-10出版日期:
2020-01-08发布日期:
2020-03-22通讯作者:
陈刚 E-mail:fodeng73@163.com基金资助:
Sun Liyun, Lu Yue, Zhang Shunkang, Chen Gang()
Received:
2019-11-26Revised:
2019-12-10Online:
2020-01-08Published:
2020-03-22Contact:
Chen Gang E-mail:fodeng73@163.comSupported by:
摘要:
目的探讨cT1-2N1M0期乳腺癌新辅助化疗和改良根治术后达到腋窝淋巴结转移0~3枚的患者行术后放疗的价值。方法回顾性分析2000年1月1日至2014年12月31日本院收治的128例临床诊断为T1-2N1M0期乳腺癌患者的临床资料,所有患者均完成新辅助化疗和改良根治手术,术后腋窝淋巴结转移数为0~3枚。根据有无术后放疗将患者分为放疗组(n=87)和未放疗组(n=41),两组术后腋窝淋巴结转移达1~3枚(ypN1)患者分别为43、11例,术后腋窝淋巴结转移0枚(ypN0)患者分别为44、30例。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算患者5年无局部/区域复发生存(LRFS)率、无瘤生存(DFS)率和总生存(OS)率,并进行log-rank检验,单因素分析患者临床特征和治疗对预后的影响。结果128例患者的5年LRFS率、DFS率和OS率分别为91.4%、82.8%和93.0%。放疗组和未放疗组患者的5年LRFS率分别为94.3%和85.4%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.055,P=0.080);5年DFS率分别为89.7%和68.3%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.312,P=0.005);5年OS率分别为94.3%和90.2%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.810,P=0.368)。亚组分析中,放疗组和未放疗组术后达ypN1患者的5年LRFS率分别为93.0%和72.7%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.248,P=0.039);5年DFS率分别为88.4%和63.6%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.525,P=0.033);5年OS率分别为90.7%和81.8%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.713,P=0.399)。放疗组和未放疗组患者术后ypN0患者的5年LRFS率分别为95.5%和90.0%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.872,P=0.350);5年DFS率分别为90.9%和70.0%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.439,P=0.019);5年OS率分别为97.7%和93.3%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.876,P=0.349)。单因素分析结果显示,年龄(χ2=11.709,P=0.001)和有无脉管瘤栓(χ2=7.608,P=0.006)是5年LRFS的影响因素,有无术后放疗(χ2=9.312,P=0.002)是5年DFS的影响因素,年龄(χ2=6.093,P=0.014)和激素受体状态(χ2=3.974,P=0.046)是OS的影响因素。结论cT1-2N1M0期乳腺癌经新辅助化疗和改良根治术后ypN1的患者,行术后放疗有局部控制获益,并能改善患者DFS;而cT1-2N1M0期乳腺癌经新辅助化疗和改良根治术后ypN0的患者,术后放疗价值仍需进一步研究。
孙丽云, 卢月, 张顺康, 陈刚. cT1-2N1M0期乳腺癌新辅助化疗和改良根治术后腋窝淋巴结转移0~3枚患者术后放疗的生存分析[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2020, 47(1): 10-17.
Sun Liyun, Lu Yue, Zhang Shunkang, Chen Gang. Survival analysis of postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer staged in cT1-2N1M0after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 0-3 metastatic lymph nodes[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2020, 47(1): 10-17.
表1
128例接受新辅助化疗cT1-2N1M0期乳腺癌患者一般临床资料(例)"
临床特征 | 放疗组 (n=87) |
未放疗组 (n=41) |
χ2值 | P值 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄(岁) | ||||||||
≤40 | 20 | 9 | 0.017 | 0.896 | ||||
>40 | 67 | 32 | ||||||
月经状态 | ||||||||
绝经前 | 46 | 19 | 0.476 | 0.490 | ||||
绝经后 | 41 | 22 | ||||||
临床分期 | ||||||||
T1N1M0 | 33 | 24 | 4.790 | 0.029 | ||||
T2N1M0 | 54 | 17 | ||||||
pCR | ||||||||
是 | 15 | 10 | 0.906 | 0.341 | ||||
否 | 72 | 31 | ||||||
病理T分期 | ||||||||
T0-Tis | 16 | 10 | ||||||
T1-2 | 69 | 31 | 1.154 | 0.536 | ||||
T3 | 2 | 0 | ||||||
病理分级 | ||||||||
1-2级 | 51 | 22 | ||||||
3级 | 33 | 19 | 1.545 | 0.524 | ||||
不详 | 3 | 0 | ||||||
术后病理N分期 | ||||||||
ypN0 | 44 | 30 | 5.834 | 0.016 | ||||
ypN1 | 43 | 11 | ||||||
病理类型 | ||||||||
浸润性导管癌 | 80 | 40 | 0.691 | 0.406 | ||||
其他 | 7 | 1 | ||||||
脉管瘤栓 | ||||||||
有 | 59 | 25 | 0.578 | 0.447 | ||||
无 | 28 | 16 | ||||||
激素受体状态 | ||||||||
阴性 | 49 | 24 | 0.056 | 0.813 | ||||
阳性 | 38 | 17 | ||||||
HER-2状态 | ||||||||
阴性 | 52 | 20 | ||||||
阳性 | 33 | 20 | 1.605 | 0.490 | ||||
不确定 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
临床特征 | 放疗组 (n=87) |
未放疗组 (n=41) |
χ2值 | P值 | ||||
辅助化疗 | ||||||||
无 | 19 | 10 | 0.104 | 0.748 | ||||
有 | 68 | 31 | ||||||
总体化疗周期数 | ||||||||
<6 | 23 | 14 | 0.806 | 0.369 | ||||
≥6 | 64 | 27 | ||||||
靶向治疗 | ||||||||
无 | 69 | 34 | 0.232 | 0.630 | ||||
有 | 18 | 7 | ||||||
内分泌治疗 | ||||||||
无 | 52 | 24 | 0.018 | 0.895 | ||||
有 | 35 | 17 |
表2
128例接受新辅助化疗cT1-2N1M0期乳腺癌患者的预后影响因素分析(%)"
临床病理特征 | 5年LRFS率 | χ2值 | P值 | 5年DFS率 | χ2值 | P值 | 5年OS率 | χ2值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄(岁) | |||||||||||
≤40 | 75.9 | 11.709 | 0.001 | 72.4 | 3.066 | 0.080 | 82.8 | 6.093 | 0.014 | ||
>40 | 96.0 | 85.9 | 96.0 | ||||||||
月经状态 | |||||||||||
绝经前 | 87.7 | 2.173 | 0.140 | 83.1 | 0.004 | 0.948 | 92.3 | 0.075 | 0.748 | ||
绝经后 | 95.2 | 82.5 | 93.7 | ||||||||
临床分期 | |||||||||||
T1 | 87.7 | 1.698 | 0.193 | 78.9 | 0.960 | 0.327 | 93.0 | 0.000 | 0.998 | ||
T2 | 94.4 | 85.9 | 93.0 | ||||||||
pCR | |||||||||||
是 | 96.0 | 0.849 | 0.357 | 92.0 | 1.776 | 0.183 | 96.0 | 0.476 | 0.490 | ||
否 | 90.3 | 80.6 | 92.2 | ||||||||
病理T分期 | |||||||||||
T0-Tis | 100 | 96.2 | 100 | ||||||||
T1-2 | 89.0 | 3.330 | 0.189 | 79.0 | 4.468 | 0.107 | 91.0 | 2.664 | 0.264 | ||
T3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
病理分级 | |||||||||||
1~2级 | 91.8 | 84.9 | 93.2 | ||||||||
3级 | 90.4 | 0.349 | 0.840 | 78.8 | 1.254 | 0.534 | 92.3 | 0.258 | 0.879 | ||
不详 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
临床病理特征 | 5年LRFS率 | χ2值 | P值 | 5年DFS率 | χ2值 | P值 | 5年OS率 | χ2值 | P值 | ||
术后病理N分期 | |||||||||||
ypN0 | 93.2 | 0.685 | 0.408 | 82.4 | 0.018 | 0.893 | 95.9 | 2.122 | 0.145 | ||
ypN1 | 88.9 | 83.3 | 88.9 | ||||||||
病理类型 | |||||||||||
浸润性导管癌 | 91.7 | 0.207 | 0.649 | 82.5 | 0.082 | 0.775 | 93.3 | 0.469 | 0.494 | ||
其他 | 91.4 | 87.5 | 87.5 | ||||||||
脉管瘤栓 | |||||||||||
有 | 96.4 | 7.608 | 0.006 | 86.9 | 2.761 | 0.097 | 92.9 | 0.001 | 0.976 | ||
无 | 81.8 | 75.0 | 93.2 | ||||||||
激素受体状态 | |||||||||||
阴性 | 90.4 | 0.268 | 0.605 | 79.5 | 1.448 | 0.229 | 89.0 | 3.974 | 0.046 | ||
阳性 | 92.7 | 87.3 | 98.2 | ||||||||
HER-2状态 | |||||||||||
阴性 | 93.1 | 83.3 | 91.7 | ||||||||
阳性 | 88.7 | 1.076 | 0.584 | 81.1 | 0.733 | 0.693 | 94.3 | 0.486 | 0.784 | ||
不确定 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
辅助化疗 | |||||||||||
无 | 93.1 | 0.172 | 0.679 | 89.7 | 1.255 | 0.263 | 93.1 | 0.003 | 0.958 | ||
有 | 90.9 | 80.8 | 92.9 | ||||||||
总化疗周期 | |||||||||||
<6 | 94.6 | 0.745 | 0.388 | 91.9 | 3.091 | 0.079 | 97.3 | 1.550 | 0.213 | ||
≥6 | 90.1 | 79.1 | 91.2 | ||||||||
靶向治疗 | |||||||||||
无 | 91.3 | 0.005 | 0.945 | 84.5 | 1.096 | 0.295 | 93.2 | 0.062 | 0.804 | ||
有 | 92.0 | 76.0 | 92.0 | ||||||||
内分泌治疗 | |||||||||||
无 | 88.2 | 2.525 | 0.112 | 77.6 | 3.428 | 0.064 | 89.5 | 3.455 | 0.063 | ||
有 | 96.2 | 90.4 | 98.1 | ||||||||
术后放疗 | |||||||||||
无 | 85.4 | 3.055 | 0.080 | 68.3 | 9.312 | 0.002 | 90.2 | 0.810 | 0.368 | ||
有 | 94.3 | 89.6 | 94.3 |
[1] | NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Breast Cancer (Version 1.2018)[EB/OL]. (2018-11-01). [2018-12-28] www.nccn.org/patients. |
[2] | Huang L, Chen S, Yang WT , et al. Risk factors of locoregional relapse in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy following mastectomy and radiotherapy[J]. Oncotarget, 2017,8(24):39703-39710. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14407. |
[3] | Klein J, Tran W, Watkins E , et al. Locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort analysis[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019,19(1):306. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5499-2. |
[4] | Li XB, Krishnamurti U, Bhattarai S , et al. Biomarkers predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2016,145(6):871-878. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw045. |
[5] | Fowble BL, Einck JP, Kim DN , et al. Role of postmastectomy radiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ breast cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012,83(2):494-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.068. |
[6] | Huang EH, Tucker SL, Strom EA , et al. Postmastectomy radiation improves local-regional control and survival for selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004,22(23):4691-4699. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.129. |
[7] | Overgaard M, Nielsen HM, Overgaard J . Is the benefit of postmastectomy irradiation limited to patients with four or more positive nodes, as recommended in international consensus reports? A subgroup analysis of the DBCG 82 b&c randomized trials[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2007,82(3):247-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.001. |
[8] | EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group), McGale P, Taylor C , et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality:meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8 135 women in 22 randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2014,383(9935):2127-2135. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8. |
[9] | Moo TA, El-Tamer M . ASO author reflections: locoregional recu-rrence rates are low with the selective use of pMRT in patients with T1-2tumors and one to three positive lymph nodes[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018,25(Suppl 3):691-692. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7010-8. |
[10] | 铁剑, 张丝媛 . 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋淋巴结1~3枚转移的患者改良根治术后放射治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2015,9(3):168-172. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2015.03.003. |
[11] | Barbosa C Rocha F, Falcone AB, Buzaid AC , et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer treatment: an expert panel recommendation from the Brazilian society of breast surgeons 2018[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2018,172(2):265-272. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4912-x. |
[12] | Shim SJ, Park W, Huh SJ , et al. The role of postmastectomy radiation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinical stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ breast cancer patients with pN0: a multicenter, retrospective study (KROG 12-05)[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2014,88(1):65-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.021. |
[13] | Le Scodan R, Selz J, Stevens D , et al. Radiotherapy for stage Ⅱ and stage Ⅲ breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy and mastectomy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012,82(1):e1-e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.054. |
[14] | Cao L, Ou D, Shen KW , et al. Outcome of postmastectomy radiotherapy after primary systemic treatment in patients with clinical T1-2N1breast cancer[J]. Cancer Radiother, 2018,22(1):38-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.051. |
[15] | Krug D, Lederer B, Seither F , et al. Post-mastectomy radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a pooled retrospective analysis of three prospective randomized trials[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019,26(12):3892-3901. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07635-x. |
[16] | Wang X, Xu L, Yin Z , et al. Locoregional recurrence-associated factors and risk-adapted postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer staged in cT1-2N0-1after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2018,10:4105-4112. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S173628. |
[1] | 钱晓涛, 石子宜, 胡格, 吴晓维.Ⅲ~ⅣA期食管鳞状细胞癌放化疗后行巩固化疗的疗效:一项真实世界临床研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 326-331. |
[2] | 杨蜜, 别俊, 张加勇, 邓佳秀, 唐组阁, 卢俊.局部晚期可切除食管癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后分析[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 332-337. |
[3] | 王盈, 刘楠, 郭兵.抗体药物偶联物在转移性乳腺癌治疗中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 364-369. |
[4] | 范志鹏, 余静, 胡静, 廖正凯, 徐禹, 欧阳雯, 谢丛华.炎症标志物的变化趋势对一线接受免疫联合化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的预测价值[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(5): 257-266. |
[5] | 杨琳, 路宁, 温华, 张明鑫, 朱琳.炎症负荷指数与胃癌临床关系研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(5): 274-279. |
[6] | 刘萍萍, 何学芳, 张翼, 杨旭, 张珊珊, 季一飞.原发性脑胶质瘤患者术后复发危险因素及预测模型构建[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 193-197. |
[7] | 万芳, 杨钢, 李睿, 万启晶.食管癌患者血清miR-497、miR-383水平及临床意义[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 204-209. |
[8] | 姚益新, 沈煜霖.血清SOCS3、TXNIP水平对肝细胞癌TACE治疗预后的预测价值[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 217-222. |
[9] | 萨蔷, 徐航程, 王佳玉.乳腺癌免疫治疗研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 227-234. |
[10] | 杨智, 陆以乔, 顾花艳, 丁佳玲, 郭贵龙.肿瘤微环境介导乳腺癌靶向治疗耐药的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 235-238. |
[11] | 孙维蔚, 姚学敏, 王鹏健, 王静, 贾敬好.基于血液学指标探讨免疫治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌预后因素及列线图构建[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 143-150. |
[12] | 刘玉兰, 井海燕, 孙静, 宋伟, 沙丹.胃癌免疫治疗疗效预测及预后标志物的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 175-180. |
[13] | 彭琴, 蔡玉婷, 王伟.KPNA2在肝癌中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 181-185. |
[14] | 陈波光, 王苏贵, 张永杰.血清胆碱酯酶与炎症标志物在ⅠA~ⅢA期乳腺癌预后中的作用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(2): 73-82. |
[15] | 金旭东, 陈忠坚, 毛伟敏.MTAP基因在恶性间皮瘤中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(2): 99-104. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||