国际肿瘤学杂志››2022,Vol. 49››Issue (4): 206-209.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20220221-00036
收稿日期:
2022-02-21修回日期:
2022-03-12出版日期:
2022-04-08发布日期:
2022-05-11通讯作者:
马飞 E-mail:drmafei@126.com基金资助:
Li Lixi, Wen Tingyu, Guan Xiuwen, Zhai Jingtong, Ma Fei()
Received:
2022-02-21Revised:
2022-03-12Online:
2022-04-08Published:
2022-05-11Contact:
Ma Fei E-mail:drmafei@126.comSupported by:
摘要:
目的探讨中国早发性(发病年龄≤35岁)乳腺癌遗传易感基因的胚系突变率及临床特征。方法收集2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院收治的150例发病年龄≤35岁的乳腺癌患者的临床信息和外周血标本,提取DNA检测乳腺癌易感基因(BRCA)1、BRCA2、毛细血管扩张性共济失调突变(ATM)、BRCA2定位协作基因(PALB2)、肿瘤蛋白53(TP53)和细胞周期检查点激酶2(CHEK2)基因的胚系突变。根据遗传变异的分类标准与指南对突变进行解读,分为致病、可能致病、意义未明、可能良性和良性。根据有无携带致病或可能致病胚系突变,将患者分为突变组(n=18)和非突变组(n=132),采用χ2检验分析组间遗传易感基因胚系突变与临床病理特征的关系。结果150例早发性乳腺癌中检测到18例致病或可能致病胚系突变,总突变率为12.0%。其中,8例(5.3%)BRCA2突变,7例(4.7%)BRCA1突变,1例(0.7%)PALB2突变,2例(1.3%)TP53突变,ATM和CHEK2基因未检测到致病或可能致病突变。突变类型以移码突变(9/18,50.0%)为主,其次是无义突变(7/18,38.9%),错义突变(1/18,5.6%)和剪接受体突变(1/18,5.6%)。18例突变携带者分子分型中,9例Luminal B,6例三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC),2例Luminal A,人表皮生长因子受体-2(HER-2)扩增仅1例。其中,8例BRCA2突变携带者均为Luminal分型,7例BRCA1突变携带者中6例是TNBC分型。突变组和非突变组乳腺癌患者家族史(P=0.343)、雌激素受体(ER)状态(χ2=0.16,P=0.688)、HER-2状态(χ2=2.89,P=0.089)、分子分型(χ2=1.99,P=0.575)、初诊TNM分期(χ2=2.49,P=0.115)差异均无统计学意义。结论早发性乳腺癌具有较高的胚系突变率,建议早发性乳腺癌患者进行遗传咨询和多基因检测。
黎立喜, 温霆宇, 管秀雯, 翟婧彤, 马飞. 早发性乳腺癌的遗传易感基因及临床特征[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 206-209.
Li Lixi, Wen Tingyu, Guan Xiuwen, Zhai Jingtong, Ma Fei. Genetic susceptibility genes and clinical features of early-onset breast cancer[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2022, 49(4): 206-209.
表1
18例早发性乳腺癌遗传易感基因的变异位点、突变类型及分子分型"
患者编号 | 基因 | 变异位点 | 突变类型 | 致病性 | 分子分型 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BRCA1 | c.1504_1508del | 移码突变 | 致病 | TNBC |
2 | BRCA1 | c.5503C>T | 无义突变 | 致病 | TNBC |
3 | BRCA1 | c.5503C>T | 无义突变 | 致病 | TNBC |
4 | BRCA1 | c.5194 -2A>G | 剪接受体 | 致病 | TNBC |
5 | BRCA1 | c.962G>A | 无义突变 | 致病 | HER-2扩增 |
6 | BRCA1 | c.5146del | 移码突变 | 可能致病 | TNBC |
7 | BRCA1 | c.3472G>T | 无义突变 | 致病 | TNBC |
8 | BRCA2 | c.1921del | 移码突变 | 可能致病 | Luminal A |
9 | BRCA2 | c.7142del | 移码突变 | 致病 | Luminal B |
10 | BRCA2 | c.6486_6489del | 移码突变 | 致病 | Luminal B |
11 | BRCA2 | c.1796_1800del | 移码突变 | 致病 | Luminal B |
12 | BRCA2 | c.6952C>T | 无义突变 | 致病 | Luminal B |
13 | BRCA2 | c.5166dup | 移码突变 | 致病 | Luminal B |
14 | BRCA2 | c.5791C>T | 无义突变 | 致病 | Luminal B |
15 | BRCA2 | c.5789del | 移码突变 | 致病 | Luminal B |
16 | PALB2 | c.2863del | 移码突变 | 可能致病 | Luminal B |
17 | TP53 | c.724T>A | 错义突变 | 可能致病 | Luminal B |
18 | TP53 | c.499C>T | 无义突变 | 致病 | Luminal A |
表2
两组早发性乳腺癌患者胚系突变与临床病理特征的关系[例(%)]"
临床特征 | 例数 | 突变组 (n=18) |
非突变组 (n=132) |
χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
乳腺癌家族史 | |||||
阳性 | 10 | 2(11.1) | 8(6.1) | - | 0.343 |
阴性 | 140 | 16(88.9) | 124(93.9) | ||
ER状态 | |||||
阳性 | 98 | 11(61.1) | 87(65.9) | 0.16 | 0.688 |
阴性 | 52 | 7(38.9) | 45(34.1) | ||
HER-2状态 | |||||
阳性 | 42 | 2(11.1) | 40(30.3) | 2.89 | 0.089 |
阴性 | 108 | 16(88.9) | 92(69.7) | ||
分子分型 | |||||
Luminal A | 22 | 2(11.1) | 20(15.2) | 1.99 | 0.575 |
Luminal B | 78 | 9(50.0) | 69(52.3) | ||
HER-2扩增 | 17 | 1(5.6) | 16(12.1) | ||
TNBC | 33 | 6(33.3) | 27(20.5) | ||
初诊TNM分期 | |||||
Ⅰ~Ⅱ期 | 107 | 10(55.6) | 97(73.5) | 2.49 | 0.115 |
Ⅲ~Ⅳ期 | 43 | 8(44.4) | 35(26.5) |
[1] | Johnson RH, Anders CK, Litton JK, et al. Breast cancer in adolescents and young adults[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2018, 65(12): e27397. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27397. doi:10.1002/pbc.27397 |
[2] | Bayraktar S, Amendola L, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancer in BRCA-carriers and non-carriers in women 35 years of age or less[J]. Breast, 2014, 23(6): 770-774. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.010. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.010pmid:25231195 |
[3] | Song QK, Li J, Huang R, et al. Age of diagnosis of breast cancer in China: almost 10 years earlier than in the United States and the European union[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014, 15(22): 10021-10025. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.22.10021. doi:10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.22.10021 |
[4] | Daly MB, Pilarski R, Yurgelun MB, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1. 2020[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2020, 18(4): 380-391. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0017. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2020.0017 |
[5] | Li MM, Datto M, Duncavage EJ, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the association for molecular pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists[J]. J Mol Diagn, 2017, 19(1): 4-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.002. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.002 |
[6] | Buys SS, Sandbach JF, Gammon A, et al. A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25-gene panel of hereditary cancer genes[J]. Cancer, 2017, 123(10): 1721-1730. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30498. doi:10.1002/cncr.30498 |
[7] | Sun J, Meng H, Yao L, et al. Germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes in a large series of unselected breast cancer patients[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2017, 23(20): 6113-6119. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3227. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3227 |
[8] | Chen S, Iversen ES, Friebel T, et al. Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(6): 863-871. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.03.6772. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.6772 |
[9] | Yoon KH, Chae S, Kang E, et al. Contralateral breast cancer and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers at high-risk of hereditary breast cancer[J]. J Breast Cancer, 2019, 22(4): 587-598. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e47. doi:10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e47 |
[10] | Graeser MK, Engel C, Rhiem K, et al. Contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(35): 5887-5892. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.19.9430. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9430pmid:19858402 |
[11] | Yip CH, Taib NA, Choo WY, et al. Clinical and pathologic dif-ferences between BRCA1-, BRCA2-, and non-BRCA-associated breast cancers in a multiracial developing country[J]. World J Surg, 2009, 33(10): 2077-2081. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0146-8. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0146-8 |
[12] | Sheng S, Xu Y, Guo Y, et al. Prevalence and clinical impact of TP53 germline mutations in Chinese women with breast cancer[J]. Int J Cancer, 2020, 146(2): 487-495. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32424. doi:10.1002/ijc.32424 |
[13] | Hauke J, Horvath J, Groß E, et al. Gene panel testing of 5589 BRCA1/2-negative index patients with breast cancer in a routine diagnostic setting: results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer[J]. Cancer Med, 2018, 7(4): 1349-1358. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1376. doi:10.1002/cam4.1376 |
[14] | Tung N, Lin NU, Kidd J, et al. Frequency of germline mutations in 25 cancer susceptibility genes in a sequential series of patients with breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(13): 1460-1468. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0747. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0747 |
[15] | Chan A, Pintilie M, Vallis K, et al. Breast cancer in women < or =35 years: review of 1 002 cases from a single institution[J]. Ann Oncol, 2000, 11(10): 1255-1262. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008391401404. doi:10.1023/a:1008391401404pmid:11106113 |
[16] | Gogia A, Raina V, Deo SV, et al. Young breast cancer: a single center experience[J]. Indian J Cancer, 2014, 51(4): 604-608. DOI: 10.4103/0019-509x.175332. doi:10.4103/0019-509X.175332pmid:26842210 |
[17] | Atchley DP, Albarracin CT, Lopez A, et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(26): 4282-4288. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.16.6231. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6231pmid:18779615 |
[18] | Eccles DM, Li N, Handwerker R, et al. Genetic testing in a cohort of young patients with HER2-amplified breast cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2016, 27(3): 467-473. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv592. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv592pmid:26681682 |
[1] | 王盈, 刘楠, 郭兵.抗体药物偶联物在转移性乳腺癌治疗中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 364-369. |
[2] | 萨蔷, 徐航程, 王佳玉.乳腺癌免疫治疗研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 227-234. |
[3] | 杨智, 陆以乔, 顾花艳, 丁佳玲, 郭贵龙.肿瘤微环境介导乳腺癌靶向治疗耐药的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 235-238. |
[4] | 陈波光, 王苏贵, 张永杰.血清胆碱酯酶与炎症标志物在ⅠA~ⅢA期乳腺癌预后中的作用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(2): 73-82. |
[5] | 顾花艳, 朱腾, 郭贵龙.乳房微生物群与乳腺癌:现状与未来[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 55-58. |
[6] | 王景, 许文婷.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、癌胚抗原联合凝血指标对直径≤1.0 cm的良恶性乳腺结节鉴别诊断价值研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(9): 520-526. |
[7] | 冯诚天, 黄芙蓉, 曹世玉, 王健宇, 南丁阿比雅思, 姜永冬, 朱娟英.HER2阳性乳腺癌患者HER2表达水平与影像学特征的关系[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(9): 527-531. |
[8] | 冯东旭, 吴炜, 高平发, 王军, 施丽娟, 陈大伟, 李文兵, 张美峰.miR-451通过调控Rho/ROCK1信号通路对乳腺癌细胞糖酵解及凋亡的影响[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(8): 449-456. |
[9] | 王文德, 曾德.乳腺癌内分泌治疗耐药的机制研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 352-356. |
[10] | 李青珊, 谢鑫, 张楠, 刘帅.放疗联合系统治疗在乳腺癌中的应用进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 362-367. |
[11] | 朱军, 黄美金, 李媛, 刘泽刚, 荀欣, 陈宏.HER2低表达乳腺癌的靶向治疗研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 236-240. |
[12] | 周婷, 徐少华, 梅林.贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨治疗晚期乳腺癌的有效性及安全性[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(3): 144-149. |
[13] | 黎立喜, 张娣, 罗扬, 马飞.PARP抑制剂在乳腺癌中的临床应用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 91-96. |
[14] | 陈群响, 张晓钰, 张妍, 张凯翔, 李捷, 陈曦.伊尼妥单抗联合长春瑞滨治疗HER2阳性转移性乳腺癌1例[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(12): 763-765. |
[15] | 耿睿, 马俊强, 郭强, 牛钊峰.老年乳腺癌患者的综合治疗方式选择倾向及其影响因素[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(11): 650-654. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||