国际肿瘤学杂志››2023,Vol. 50››Issue (9): 527-531.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20221214-00101
冯诚天1, 黄芙蓉2, 曹世玉3, 王健宇2, 南丁阿比雅思4, 姜永冬2(), 朱娟英1(
)
收稿日期:
2022-12-14修回日期:
2023-06-22出版日期:
2023-09-08发布日期:
2023-10-26通讯作者:
姜永冬,朱娟英 E-mail:jiangyongdonghmu@126.com;tiaopidaodi@163.com基金资助:
Feng Chengtian1, Huang Furong2, Cao Shiyu3, Wang Jianyu2, Nanding Abiyasi4, Jiang Yongdong2(), Zhu Juanying1(
)
Received:
2022-12-14Revised:
2023-06-22Online:
2023-09-08Published:
2023-10-26Contact:
Jiang Yongdong, Zhu Juanying E-mail:jiangyongdonghmu@126.com;tiaopidaodi@163.comSupported by:
摘要:
目的探讨人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌HER2表达水平与超声影像学、乳腺X线影像学检查特征的关系。方法收集2014年1月至2021年12月于哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院就诊的486例HER2阳性乳腺癌患者的影像学资料。分析HER2表达水平与乳腺超声影像学及乳腺X线影像学特征的关系。结果HER2阳性乳腺癌患者中HER2 2+占49.38%(240/486),HER2 3+占50.62%(246/486)。HER2 2+患者的年龄[(52.88±1.16)岁]大于HER2 3+患者的年龄[(49.59±1.00)岁],差异有统计学意义(t=18.07,P<0.001);HER2 2+患者与HER2 3+患者的月经状态差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.42,P=0.036)。HER2 2+患者与HER2 3+患者在超声示毛刺征(χ2=8.37,P=0.010)、后方回声(χ2=9.68,P=0.017)、腋窝淋巴结肿大(χ2=15.77,P<0.001)方面,差异均有统计学意义;HER2 2+患者与HER2 3+患者在乳腺X线影像学示有无肿块方面,差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.81,P<0.001)。结论HER2阳性乳腺癌HER2表达水平与超声示毛刺征、后方回声、腋窝淋巴结肿大,乳腺X线影像学示有无肿块相关,可为临床预测乳腺癌的恶性程度、预估预后及个体化治疗方案的制定提供一定的信息。
冯诚天, 黄芙蓉, 曹世玉, 王健宇, 南丁阿比雅思, 姜永冬, 朱娟英. HER2阳性乳腺癌患者HER2表达水平与影像学特征的关系[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(9): 527-531.
Feng Chengtian, Huang Furong, Cao Shiyu, Wang Jianyu, Nanding Abiyasi, Jiang Yongdong, Zhu Juanying. Relationships between HER2 protein expression and imaging features in HER2 positive breast cancer patients[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2023, 50(9): 527-531.
表2
486例HER2阳性乳腺癌患者HER2表达水平与超声影像学特征的关系[$\bar{x}±s$/例(%)]"
超声影像学 特征 |
HER2 2+ (n=240) |
HER2 3+ (n=246) |
t/χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
肿瘤直径(mm) | 25.18±1.45 | 24.94±1.32 | 0.06 | 0.809 |
纵横比 | ||||
≤1 | 224(93.33) | 224(91.05) | ||
>1 | 8(3.33) | 10(4.07) | 0.95 | 0.622 |
不详 | 8(3.33) | 12(4.88) | ||
毛刺征 | ||||
无 | 208(86.67) | 232(94.31) | ||
有 | 28(11.66) | 13(5.28) | 8.37 | 0.010 |
不详 | 4(1.67) | 1(0.41) | ||
内部回声 | ||||
均匀 | 23(9.58) | 17(6.91) | ||
不均匀 | 213(88.75) | 228(92.68) | 2.98 | 0.212 |
不详 | 4(1.67) | 1(0.41) | ||
后方回声 | ||||
无改变 | 213(88.75) | 199(80.89) | 9.68 | 0.017 |
衰减 | 18(7.50) | 36(14.63) | ||
增强 | 5(2.08) | 10(4.07) | ||
不详 | 4(1.67) | 1(0.41) | ||
微钙化 | ||||
无 | 76(31.67) | 82(33.33) | ||
有 | 162(67.50) | 163(66.26) | 0.57 | 0.800 |
不详 | 2(0.83) | 1(0.41) | ||
腋窝淋巴结肿大 | ||||
无 | 172(71.67) | 134(54.47) | ||
有 | 65(27.08) | 109(44.31) | 15.77 | <0.001 |
不详 | 3(1.25) | 3(1.22) |
表3
486例HER2阳性乳腺癌患者HER2表达水平与乳腺X线影像学特征的关系[例(%)]"
X线影像学 特征 |
HER2 2+ (n=240) |
HER2 3+ (n=246) |
χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
肿块 | ||||
无 | 83(34.58) | 46(18.70) | ||
有 | 148(61.67) | 190(77.24) | 15.81 | <0.001 |
不详 | 9(3.75) | 10(4.06) | ||
异常钙化 | ||||
无 | 103(42.92) | 83(33.74) | ||
有 | 129(53.75) | 152(61.79) | 4.43 | 0.109 |
不详 | 8(3.33) | 11(4.47) | ||
腋窝淋巴结肿大 | ||||
无 | 213(88.75) | 201(81.71) | ||
有 | 19(7.92) | 32(13.01) | 4.78 | 0.092 |
不详 | 8(3.33) | 13(5.28) |
[1] | Wu T, Li J, Wang D, et al. Identification of a correlation between the sonographic appearance and molecular subtype of invasive breast cancer: a review of 311 cases[J].Clin Imaging,2019,53: 179-185. DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.10.020. |
[2] | 高威, 邵均均, 朱敬蕊, 等. HER2蛋白表达对乳腺癌预后的影响[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2019,25(6): 484-486. |
[3] | 琚倩, 史加宁, 杨继鑫, 等. IHC与FISH对HER2阳性乳腺癌新辅助靶向治疗疗效的预测价值[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2022,29(2): 135-140. DOI:10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2022.02.08. |
[4] | Giuliani S, Ciniselli CM, Leonardi E, et al. In a cohort of breast cancer screened patients the proportion of HER2 positive cases is lower than that earlier reported and pathological characteristics differ between HER2 3+ and HER2 2+/Her2 amplified cases[J].Virchows Arch,2016,469(1): 45-50. DOI:10.1007/s00428-016-1940-y. |
[5] | Xu B, Shen J, Zhang L, et al. HER2 protein expression level is positively associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer[J].Pathol Res Pract,2022,234: 153900. DOI:10.1016/j.prp.2022.153900. |
[6] | Wojcinski S, Stefanidou N, Hillemanns P, et al. The biology of malignant breast tumors has an impact on the presentation in ultrasound: an analysis of 315 cases[J].BMC Womens Health,2013,13: 47. DOI:10.1186/1472-6874-13-47. pmid:24252758 |
[7] | Mohanty SS. Correlation of expression of hormone and HER2 receptors with various clinico-pathological prognostic parameters and with each other in malignant breast lesion[J].Ann Diagn Pathol,2021,50: 151659. DOI:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151659. |
[8] | 周亮, 马亚楠. 乳腺癌超声毛刺征患者的相关免疫组合指标表达情况[J].中国当代医药,2022,29(31): 129-132. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2022.31.034. |
[9] | Fukui K, Masumoto N, Shiroma N, et al. Novel tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes ultrasonography score based on ultrasonic tissue fin-dings predicts tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer,2019,26(5): 573-580. DOI:10.1007/s12282-019-00958-3. pmid:30868399 |
[10] | Irshad A, Leddy R, Pisano E, et al. Assessing the role of ultrasound in predicting the biological behavior of breast cancer[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2013,200(2): 284-290. DOI:10.2214/AJR.12.8781. |
[11] | Çelebi F, Pilancı KN, Ordu Ç, et al. The role of ultrasonographic findings to predict molecular subtype, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status of breast cancer[J].Diagn Interv Radiol,2015,21(6): 448-453. DOI:10.5152/dir.2015.14515. pmid:26359880 |
[12] | Yuan C, Jin F, Guo X, et al. Correlation analysis of breast cancer DWI combined with DCE-MRI imaging features with molecular subtypes and prognostic factors[J].J Med Syst,2019,43(4): 83. DOI:10.1007/s10916-019-1197-5. pmid:30810823 |
[13] | Hanby AM. Aspects of molecular phenotype and its correlations with breast cancer behaviour and taxonomy[J].Br J Cancer,2005,92(4): 613-617. DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602421. |
[14] | Ménard S, Balsari A, Tagliabue E, et al. Biology, prognosis and response to therapy of breast carcinomas according to HER2 score[J].Ann Oncol,2008,19(10): 1706-1712. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdn369. pmid:18544559 |
[15] | Upadhyaya VS, Lim GH, Chan EYK, et al. Evaluating the preo-perative breast cancer characteristics affecting the accuracy of axi-llary ultrasound staging[J].Breast J,2020,26(2): 162-167. DOI:10.1111/tbj.13635. |
[16] | 姚娟, 李白艳, 马华, 等. 乳腺X线钼靶表现与ER、PR和HER2表达的乳腺癌亚型的病理对照研究[J].新疆医科大学学报,2017,40(9): 1181-1186. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2017.09.015. |
[17] | Rashmi S, Kamala S, Murthy SS, et al. Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer based on mammography and ultrasound findings[J].Indian J Radiol Imaging,2018,28(3): 354-361. DOI:10.4103/ijri.IJRI_78_18. |
[18] | Park YJ, Youk JH, Son EJ, et al. Comparison of hormonal receptor and HER2 status between ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy and surgery in breast cancer patients[J].Ultrasonography,2014,33(3): 206-215. DOI:10.14366/usg.14014. pmid:25038811 |
[19] | Zhou J, Tan H, Bai Y, et al. Evaluating the HER-2 status of breast cancer using mammography radiomics features[J].Eur J Radiol,2019,121: 108718. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108718. |
[20] | Sonthineni C, Mohindra N, Agrawal V, et al. Correlation of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis features of self-detected breast cancers with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2/neu status[J].South Asian J Cancer,2019,8(3): 140-144. DOI:10.4103/sajc.sajc_300_18. pmid:31489283 |
[21] | Song SE, Bae MS, Chang JM, et al. Mr and mammographic imaging features of HER2-positive breast cancers according to hormone receptor status: a retrospective comparative study[J].Acta Radiol,2017,58(7): 792-799. DOI:10.1177/0284185116673119. pmid:27754920 |
[22] | Elias SG, Adams A, Wisner DJ, et al. Imaging features of HER2 overexpression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2014,23(8): 1464-1483. DOI:10.1158/1055-9965. |
[1] | 王盈, 刘楠, 郭兵.抗体药物偶联物在转移性乳腺癌治疗中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 364-369. |
[2] | 萨蔷, 徐航程, 王佳玉.乳腺癌免疫治疗研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 227-234. |
[3] | 杨智, 陆以乔, 顾花艳, 丁佳玲, 郭贵龙.肿瘤微环境介导乳腺癌靶向治疗耐药的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 235-238. |
[4] | 陈波光, 王苏贵, 张永杰.血清胆碱酯酶与炎症标志物在ⅠA~ⅢA期乳腺癌预后中的作用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(2): 73-82. |
[5] | 赵鑫, 范学武, 田龙, 胡逸民.三维超声在前列腺癌图像引导放疗中的应用与评价研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 43-49. |
[6] | 顾花艳, 朱腾, 郭贵龙.乳房微生物群与乳腺癌:现状与未来[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 55-58. |
[7] | 王景, 许文婷.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、癌胚抗原联合凝血指标对直径≤1.0 cm的良恶性乳腺结节鉴别诊断价值研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(9): 520-526. |
[8] | 谢宇, 蒋澄, 黄明敏, 郭爱斌, 尹震宇, 林永娟.超声测量视神经鞘直径评估鞘内灌注化疗对非小细胞肺癌软脑膜转移患者颅内压的影响[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(9): 532-539. |
[9] | 冯东旭, 吴炜, 高平发, 王军, 施丽娟, 陈大伟, 李文兵, 张美峰.miR-451通过调控Rho/ROCK1信号通路对乳腺癌细胞糖酵解及凋亡的影响[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(8): 449-456. |
[10] | 王文德, 曾德.乳腺癌内分泌治疗耐药的机制研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 352-356. |
[11] | 李青珊, 谢鑫, 张楠, 刘帅.放疗联合系统治疗在乳腺癌中的应用进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 362-367. |
[12] | 朱军, 黄美金, 李媛, 刘泽刚, 荀欣, 陈宏.HER2低表达乳腺癌的靶向治疗研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 236-240. |
[13] | 周婷, 徐少华, 梅林.贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨治疗晚期乳腺癌的有效性及安全性[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(3): 144-149. |
[14] | 黎立喜, 张娣, 罗扬, 马飞.PARP抑制剂在乳腺癌中的临床应用[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 91-96. |
[15] | 陈群响, 张晓钰, 张妍, 张凯翔, 李捷, 陈曦.伊尼妥单抗联合长春瑞滨治疗HER2阳性转移性乳腺癌1例[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(12): 763-765. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||