betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 289-291.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7115.2021.04.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

同步间歇指令通气(容控与压控型)在慢阻肺急性加重患者初始有创机械通气中的临床应用

张辉, 吴霞, 陈秀平, 刘佳, 雷蕾   

  1. 滨州市中心医院重症医学科,山东 滨州 251700
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-02 出版日期:2021-04-25 发布日期:2021-09-01
  • 作者简介:张辉(1979—),男,山东滨州人,副主任医师,硕士,主要从事临床重症医学科工作。E-mail:15266750898@163.com。

The clinical application of synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation (volume and pressure-controlled) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in initial invasive mechanical ventilation

ZHANG Hui, WU Xia, CHEN Xiu-ping, LIU Jia, LEI Lei   

  1. Dept. of Critical Care Medicine,Binzhou Central Hospital,Binzhou 251700,China
  • Received:2020-11-02 Online:2021-04-25 Published:2021-09-01

摘要: 目的 探讨容控与压控型同步间歇指令通气(V-SIMV与P-SIMV)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)患者初始有创机械通气中的临床应用。方法 将86例行有创机械通气的AECOPD合并呼吸衰竭患者按随机数字表法分为对照组(V-SIMV)44例和观察组(P-SIMV组)42例。初始上机时对照组采用V-SIMV+PSV,观察组采用P-SIMV+PSV。比较两组初始有创机械通气后2 h、4 h、8 h后气道峰压(Ppeak)、平均气道压(Pmean)、支持压力(PS)、pH值、动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)及上机有效率。结果 ①两组患者上机2 h、4 h后,观察组Ppeak、Pmean、PaCO2明显低于对照组,Vte、pH值高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);PS略高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。8 h后两组Ppeak、Pmean差异仍有统计学意义,PS、Vte、pH、PaCO2差异无统计学意义。②两独立样本卡方检验示观察组上机有效率(42/42)100%;对照组有效率(32/44)72.7%,更改模式12例(27.3%),P≤0.001,差异有统计学意义。两组均无死亡、出院患者。结论 P-SIMV更适合于AECOPD患者初始有创机械通气;同时可提高该类患者的初始上机有效率。

关键词: 肺疾病, 慢性阻塞性, P-SIMV, V-SIMV

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical application of (V-SIMV and P-SIMV) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in initial invasive mechanical ventilation.Methods: Eighty-six patients with ACOPD combined with respiratory failure were randomly divided into control group (V-SIMV) and observation group (P-SIMV) in invasive mechanical ventilation with 44 cases and 42 cases respectively .At the initial time,V-SIMV+PSV was used in the control group and P-SIMV+PSV in the observation group.The peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure (Pmean), support pressure (PS), PH value, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)and effective rate were compared between the two groups 2, 4 and 8 hours after initial invasive mechanical ventilation.Results: ① The Ppeak, Pmean and PaCO2 in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the Vte and pH values were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05).PS was slightly higher than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).After 8 hours, there was statistical difference between the two groups of Ppeak and Pmean, but there was no significant difference in PS, Vte, pH and PaCO2.② The chi-square test of two independent samples showed that the effective rate of the observation group (42/42) was 100%; the control group (32/44) 72.7%;12 cases(27.3%) were changed the mode, P≤0.001, and the difference was statistically significant. There were no deaths and discharged patients in the two groups.Conclusion: P-SIMV is more suitable for initial invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with AECOPD,and can improve the effectiveness of initial mechanical ventilation in these patients.

Key words: pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive, P-SIMV, V-SIMV

中图分类号: