betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报››2024,Vol. 45››Issue (6): 331-335.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2024.06.003
• 临床研究 •上一篇
钟浩1, 李伟2, 房志卿3, 张永振3, 高泽3, 郭兆新3, 孟力维3, 刘照旭3()
收稿日期:
2024-03-05出版日期:
2024-06-25发布日期:
2024-06-03通讯作者:
刘照旭Hao ZHONG1, Wei LI2, Zhiqing FANG3, Yongzhen ZHANG3, Ze GAO3, Zhaoxin GUO3, Liwei MENG3, Zhaoxu LIU3()
Received:
2024-03-05Online:
2024-06-25Published:
2024-06-03Contact:
Zhaoxu LIU摘要:
目的分析基于六步法的显微镜下精索静脉结扎术的临床效果。方法回顾性分析山东大学齐鲁医院闵傲外科收治的102例精索静脉曲张患者在2021年9月—2022年12月进行显微镜下精索静脉结扎术的疗效,对照组(2021年9月—2022年6月,共47例)患者行常规显微镜下精索静脉结扎术,试验组(2022年7月—2022年12月,共55例)采用基于六步法的行显微镜下精索静脉结扎术,对比两组患者手术指标和并发症发生情况。结果试验组手术时间较对照组明显缩短(32.54 ± 1.68)vs.(47.76 ± 1.43)min,组间差异有统计学意义(P< 0.001),术前指标、术中其他指标(精索内静脉复合体数量、手术时间、出血量)、术后指标两组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P> 0.05)。结论基于六步法的显微镜下精索静脉结扎术,通过建立正确的手术层面,规范了手术步骤和流程,从而减少了手术时间,同时有效结扎静脉、保留动脉及淋巴管,术后并发症少,临床疗效良好。
钟浩, 李伟, 房志卿, 张永振, 高泽, 郭兆新, 孟力维, 刘照旭. 基于六步法的显微镜下精索静脉结扎术的疗效[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2024, 45(6): 331-335.
Hao ZHONG, Wei LI, Zhiqing FANG, Yongzhen ZHANG, Ze GAO, Zhaoxin GUO, Liwei MENG, Zhaoxu LIU. Study on the clinical effect of six-step microscopical varicocelectomy[J]. Journal of ShanDong First Medical University&ShanDong Academy of Medical Sciences, 2024, 45(6): 331-335.
组别 | 平均年龄/岁 | 病程/月 | 精索静脉宽度/mm | 体质量指数/(kg/m²) |
---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 28.02 ± 9.42 | 4.6 ± 3.3 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 23.77 ± 3.23 |
对照组 | 26.33 ± 8.19 | 5.3 ± 3.1 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 24.13 ± 4.29 |
t | 0.958 | -0.581 | -0.972 | -0.483 |
P | 0.340 | 0.562 | 0.333 | 0.630 |
表1两组患者术前一般资料比较(x¯ ± s)
组别 | 平均年龄/岁 | 病程/月 | 精索静脉宽度/mm | 体质量指数/(kg/m²) |
---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 28.02 ± 9.42 | 4.6 ± 3.3 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 23.77 ± 3.23 |
对照组 | 26.33 ± 8.19 | 5.3 ± 3.1 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 24.13 ± 4.29 |
t | 0.958 | -0.581 | -0.972 | -0.483 |
P | 0.340 | 0.562 | 0.333 | 0.630 |
组别 | 精索内静脉 | 精索内动脉 | 精索内淋巴管 |
---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 4.26 (3.17,6.81) | 2.83 ± 0.71 | 4.32 ± 0.53 |
对照组 | 4.72 (2.94,6.29) | 3.07 ± 0.69 | 3.81 ± 0.32 |
t/Z | -0.010 | -1.724 | 5.758 |
P | 0.992 | 0.088 | 0.080 |
表2两组患者术中精索内静脉复合体数量比较 ([M(P25,P75),(x¯ ± s)])
组别 | 精索内静脉 | 精索内动脉 | 精索内淋巴管 |
---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 4.26 (3.17,6.81) | 2.83 ± 0.71 | 4.32 ± 0.53 |
对照组 | 4.72 (2.94,6.29) | 3.07 ± 0.69 | 3.81 ± 0.32 |
t/Z | -0.010 | -1.724 | 5.758 |
P | 0.992 | 0.088 | 0.080 |
组别 | 手术时间/min | 术中出血量/mL | 术后疼痛评分 | 术后住院时间/d | 阴囊水肿 | 睾丸鞘膜积液 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 32.54 ± 1.68 | 4.76(4.25,4.75) | 2.2 ± 0.39 | 2.10 ± 0.47 | 1(1.8%) | 0 |
对照组 | 47.76 ± 1.43 | 5.08(3.58,5.34) | 2.4 ± 0.76 | 2.00 ± 0.39 | 1(2.13%) | 0 |
t/Z | -48.804 | -0.890 | -1.707 | 1.157 | ||
P | < 0.001 | 0.374 | 0.091 | 0.250 | 0.157 |
表3两组患者术中及术后一般情况比较[(x¯ ± s),M(P25,P75),n(%)]
组别 | 手术时间/min | 术中出血量/mL | 术后疼痛评分 | 术后住院时间/d | 阴囊水肿 | 睾丸鞘膜积液 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验组 | 32.54 ± 1.68 | 4.76(4.25,4.75) | 2.2 ± 0.39 | 2.10 ± 0.47 | 1(1.8%) | 0 |
对照组 | 47.76 ± 1.43 | 5.08(3.58,5.34) | 2.4 ± 0.76 | 2.00 ± 0.39 | 1(2.13%) | 0 |
t/Z | -48.804 | -0.890 | -1.707 | 1.157 | ||
P | < 0.001 | 0.374 | 0.091 | 0.250 | 0.157 |
组别 | 精子密度/(× 106/mL) | 精子存活率/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 术后 | t | P | 术前 | 术后 | t | P | |
试验组 | 49.65 ± 4.54 | 85.43 ± 6.08 | -161.728 | < 0.001 | 45.84 ± 4.79 | 63.27 ± 3.43 | -78.957 | < 0.001 |
对照组 | 51.74 ± 6.36 | 87.95 ± 7.41 | -231.699 | < 0.001 | 47.65 ± 4.46 | 62.09 ± 4.24 | -95.543 | < 0.001 |
t/t' | -1.929 | -1.887 | -1.963 | 1.553 | ||||
P | 0.057 | 0.062 | 0.052 | 0.123 |
表4两组患者精子质量比较(x¯ ± s)
组别 | 精子密度/(× 106/mL) | 精子存活率/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
术前 | 术后 | t | P | 术前 | 术后 | t | P | |
试验组 | 49.65 ± 4.54 | 85.43 ± 6.08 | -161.728 | < 0.001 | 45.84 ± 4.79 | 63.27 ± 3.43 | -78.957 | < 0.001 |
对照组 | 51.74 ± 6.36 | 87.95 ± 7.41 | -231.699 | < 0.001 | 47.65 ± 4.46 | 62.09 ± 4.24 | -95.543 | < 0.001 |
t/t' | -1.929 | -1.887 | -1.963 | 1.553 | ||||
P | 0.057 | 0.062 | 0.052 | 0.123 |
1 | Asafu-Adjei D, Judge C, Deibert CM, et al. Systematic review of the impact of varicocele grade on response to surgical management[J].J Urol,2020,203(1): 48. |
2 | 黄宇烽, 李宏军.实用男科学[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社,2015. |
3 | Goldstein M. New insights into the etiology and treatment of male infertility[J].J Urol,1997,158(5): 1808. |
4 | Lindsay TJ, Vitrikas KR. Evaluation and treatment of infertility[J].Am Fam Physician,2015,91(5): 308. |
5 | Marte A. The history of varicocele: from antiquity to the modern ERA[J].Int Braz J Urol,2018,44(3): 563. |
6 | Yuan R, Zhuo H, Cao D, et al. Efficacy and safety of varicocelectomies: a meta-analysis[J].Syst Biol Reprod Med,2017,63(2): 120. |
7 | 李美娜, 王群, 黄慧琳, 等. 三种不同路径显微外科治疗男性不育伴精索静脉曲张的疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J].中国临床研究,2017,30(5): 586. |
8 | 朱祝生, 郭建军, 刘京, 等. 不同入路显微外科手术治疗精索静脉曲张的疗效观察[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2019,8(4): 266. |
9 | Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H. Surgical comparison of subinguinal and high inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for adolescent varicocele[J].Int J Urol,2016,23(4): 338. |
10 | Johnson D, Sandlow J. Treatment of varicoceles: techniques and outcomes[J].Fertil Steril,2017,108(3): 378. |
11 | Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion[J].Fertil Steril,2014,102(6): 1556. |
12 | Wang D, Zhao W, Liu J, et al. Effects of HIF-1α on spermatogenesis of varicocele rats by regulating VEGF/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway[J].Reprod Sci,2021,28(4): 1161. |
13 | Mohamed EE, Gawish M, Mohamed A. Semen parameters and pregnancy rates after microsurgical varicocelectomy in primary versus secondary infertile men[J].Hum Fertil (Camb),2017,20(4): 293. |
14 | Peng J, Zhang Z, Cui W, et al. Spontaneous pregnancy rates in Chinese men undergoing microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy and possible preoperative factors affecting the outcomes[J].Fertil Steril,2015,103(3): 635. |
15 | Jensen CFS, Østergren P, Dupree JM, et al. Varicocele and male infertility[J].Nat Rev Urol,2017,14(9): 523. |
16 | Hao J, Shi H, Xu H, et al. Ultrasound-assisted microsurgical left spermatic-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis for treating nutcracker syndrome-associated varicocele[J].Int Urol Nephrol,2019,51(11): 1925. |
17 | 中华医学会男科学分会精索静脉曲张诊断与治疗指南编写组. 精索静脉曲张诊断与治疗指南[J].中华男科学杂志,2022,28(8): 756. |
18 | Borruto FA, Impellizzeri P, Antonuccio P, et al. Laparoscopic vs open varicocelectomy in children and adolescents: review of the recent literature and meta-analysis[J].J Pediatr Surg,2010,45(12): 2464. |
19 | Ding H, Tian J, Du W, et al. Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].BJU Int,2012,110(10): 1536. |
20 | Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique[J].J Androl,2009,30(1): 33. |
21 | 王阳. 显微外科手术与腹腔镜手术治疗精索静脉曲张的效果比较[J].中国实用医药,2021,16(28): 52. |
[1] | 翟玉喜, 刘学彦, 高建鲁, 汪鑫.不同算法在UBM小梁网区域分割中的应用[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2023, 44(11): 830-834. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||