国际肿瘤学杂志

国际肿瘤学杂志››2012,Vol. 39››Issue (5): 391-395.

• 论著 •上一篇下一篇

射线能量对应用RapidArc进行肝脏多发性肿瘤放疗的剂量学影响

巩贯忠,尹勇,翟德胤,刘同海,宋金龙,卢洁,陈进琥,王若峥

  1. 济南，山东省放射肿瘤学重点实验室 betway.com 山东省肿瘤医院物理室(巩贯忠、尹勇、翟德胤、刘同海、卢洁、陈进琥、王若峥)，介入科（宋金龙）
  • 出版日期:2012-05-08发布日期:2012-05-02
  • 通讯作者:尹勇，E-mail: yinyongsd@yahoo.com.cn E-mail:yinyongsd@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    山东省自然科学基金资助项目（ZR2010HM071）；山东省科技攻关项目(2011GGX10119)

Dosimetric difference in RapidArc planning for radiotherapy of multiple hepatic malignancy using different photon energy

GONG Guan-zhong*, YIN Yong, ZHAI De-yin, LIU Tong-hai, SONG Jin-long, LU Jie, CHEN Jin-hu, WANG Ruo-zheng

  1. *Department of Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • Online:2012-05-08Published:2012-05-02
  • Contact:YIN Yong, E-mail: yinyongsd@yahoo.com.cn E-mail:yinyongsd@yahoo.com.cn

PDF

1782

摘要：目的 探讨应用6 MV和15 MV X射线容积调强放疗（RapidArc）进行肝脏多发性恶性肿瘤放射治疗的剂量学差异。方法 选取12例多发的肝脏恶性肿瘤（原发5例，继发7例）患者进行自由呼吸下的三维计算机断层成像（3D-CT）模拟定位。针对同一患者分别应用6 MV和15 MV X射线设计单个和两个358°全弧的RapidArc计划，处方量为2 Gy/次×25次。比较不同RapidArc计划间剂量学差异.结果 4种RapidArc计划均能满足临床要求。4种RapidArc计划的适形指数(CI)、均匀性指数(HI)、靶区最大剂量和最小剂量间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)，CI均可达0.91，HI均达0.88。双弧RapidArc计划中正常肝脏V5、V10、V15略高于单弧计划， V20、V25、V30、V35、V40低于单弧计划。正常肝脏的V5至V40、胃、十二指肠、脊髓受量在不同RapidArc计划之间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)，6 MV X射线RapidArc计划的机器跳数较15 MV的平均增加12%。结论 应用全弧RapidArc技术进行肝脏多发恶性肿瘤放疗时，6 MV X射线可作为首选。 

关键词:肝肿瘤,辐射剂量,放射疗法

Abstract:Objective To investigate the dosimetric difference in the application of RapidArc using 6 and 15 MV X-rays for radiotherapy of multiple hepatic malignancy. Methods A total of 12 cases with multiple hepatic tumors (primary 5 cases and secondary 7 cases) were selected. All patients underwent the three dimensional CT simulation in free breathing. For each patient, RapidArc plans with single or two 358° arcs using 6 or 15 MV X-rays were designed respectively, the prescription dose was 2Gy per fraction×25 fractions. The dosimetric differences were compared among RapidArc plans. Results All of RapidArc plans could meet the clinical requirement. There were no significant differences in the conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), the maximum dose and the minimum dose of PTV among RapidArc plans (P>0.05). All the CI could get to 0.91 and HI could get to 0.88. In the RapidArc plans with two 358° arcs, the V5, V10, V15 of normal liver were higher than with single arc, while V20, V25, V30, V35, V40 were lower than with single arc. There were no significant differences in the different radiation dose of normal liver, stomach, duodenum and spinal cord among different plans (P>0.05). The monitor units of RapidArc plans using 6 MV X-rays increased 12% compared to 15 MV averagely. Conclusion The 6 MV X-ray would be selected chiefly in the radiotherapy of multiple haptic tumor using RapidArc with whole arc(s).

Key words:Liver neoplasms,Radiation dosage,Radiotherapy