betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报››2021,Vol. 42››Issue (12): 908-912.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2021.12.007
收稿日期:
2021-07-28出版日期:
2021-12-25发布日期:
2022-01-13通讯作者:
张建中作者简介:
张倩,硕士研究生,研究方向:麻醉学、液体治疗,E-mail:factory_2001@sohu.com。基金资助:
Qian Zhang1(), Shaoyan Huang2, Lu yong Wang3, Jianzhong Zhang4(
)
Received:
2021-07-28Online:
2021-12-25Published:
2022-01-13Contact:
Jianzhong Zhang摘要:
探讨6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4(6%Hydroxyethyl Starch130/0.4,HES)用于肝硬化患者后对蛋白的影响及作用机制。
选择肝硬化腹水患者48例,随机分为两组,分别输入乳酸钠林格(A组)和HES(B组)。患者每天输入1次,共7日,输入量为血容量公式计算血容量的5%。输液前(T0)输液第7天结束后的24小时(T1)测定总蛋白(Total protein,TB)、白蛋白(human serum albumin,HSA)、尿素氮(urea nitrogen,BUN)、肌酐(creatinine,Cr)。HES输入人体后与HSA结合,荧光光谱法分析HES和HSA的结合关系,进一步研究HES对患者HSA的影响机制。
两组相比,B组HSA(29.3 ± 3.3)g/L、TP(57.4 ± 4.3)g/L在T1时高于A组HSA(26.7 ± 3.9)g/L、TP(53.9 ± 4.5)g/L。HES加入到HSA后,HSA的二级结构发生变化。随着HES浓度增加,HSA的荧光强度降低, HES诱发HSA荧光猝灭,HES与HSA的Trp-214(Trp∶色氨酸)形成1∶1的结合物。
HES减少肝硬化患者低蛋白血症的发生,与HES和HSA的Trp-214结合形成1∶1复合物,体积增大,利于HES的机械堵漏。
中图分类号:
张倩, 黄绍艳, 王鲁甬, 张建中. 6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4影响肝硬化患者蛋白渗漏的作用机制[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2021, 42(12): 908-912.
Qian Zhang, Shaoyan Huang, Lu yong Wang, Jianzhong Zhang. Influence mechanism of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on protein leakage in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Journal of Shandong First Medical Unversity & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 2021, 42(12): 908-912.
组别 | 性别比例(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | BMI (kg/ m2) | Child-pugh分级(B/C) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 13/11 | 53.5 ± 6.8 | 23.5 ± 3.5 | 17/7 |
B组 | 12/12 | 52.7 ± 7.6 | 23.7 ± 3.9 | 16/8 |
统计量值 | χ2=0.100 | t= 0.351 | t= 0.171 | χ2=0.125 |
P | 0.752 | 0.728 | 0.865 | 0.723 |
表1两组患者一般情况的比较(xˉ ± s)
组别 | 性别比例(男/女) | 年龄(岁) | BMI (kg/ m2) | Child-pugh分级(B/C) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 13/11 | 53.5 ± 6.8 | 23.5 ± 3.5 | 17/7 |
B组 | 12/12 | 52.7 ± 7.6 | 23.7 ± 3.9 | 16/8 |
统计量值 | χ2=0.100 | t= 0.351 | t= 0.171 | χ2=0.125 |
P | 0.752 | 0.728 | 0.865 | 0.723 |
组别 | T0 | T1 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 27.7 ± 3.4 | 26.7 ± 3.9 | 0.863 1 | 0.393 6 |
B组 | 27.8 ± 3.6 | 29.9 ± 3.3b | 1.922 8 | 0.062 1 |
t | 0.089 8 | 2.799 8 | ||
P | 0.928 9 | < 0.001 |
表2两组患者HSA的比较(n = 24,xˉ ± s,g/L)
组别 | T0 | T1 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 27.7 ± 3.4 | 26.7 ± 3.9 | 0.863 1 | 0.393 6 |
B组 | 27.8 ± 3.6 | 29.9 ± 3.3b | 1.922 8 | 0.062 1 |
t | 0.089 8 | 2.799 8 | ||
P | 0.928 9 | < 0.001 |
组别 | T0 | T1 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 54.8 ± 4.6 | 53.9 ± 4.5 | 0.625 8 | 0.535 2 |
B组 | 55.1 ± 4.4 | 57.4 ± 4.3 | 1.671 7 | 0.102 8 |
t | 0.210 7 | 2.514 6 | ||
P | 0.834 2 | 0.016 3 |
表3两组患者TP的比较(n = 24,xˉ ± s, g/L)
组别 | T0 | T1 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 54.8 ± 4.6 | 53.9 ± 4.5 | 0.625 8 | 0.535 2 |
B组 | 55.1 ± 4.4 | 57.4 ± 4.3 | 1.671 7 | 0.102 8 |
t | 0.210 7 | 2.514 6 | ||
P | 0.834 2 | 0.016 3 |
组别 | T0 | T1 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 105.1 ± 5.4 | 109 ± 4.7 | 2.436 3 | 0.197 0 |
B组 | 107.8 ± 5.3 | 110 ± 5.2 | 1.325 1 | 0.193 0 |
t | 1.595 9 | 0.638 7 | ||
P | 0.118 8 | 0.526 9 |
表4两组患者Cr的比较(n = 24,xˉ ± s, umol/L)
组别 | T0 | T1 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 105.1 ± 5.4 | 109 ± 4.7 | 2.436 3 | 0.197 0 |
B组 | 107.8 ± 5.3 | 110 ± 5.2 | 1.325 1 | 0.193 0 |
t | 1.595 9 | 0.638 7 | ||
P | 0.118 8 | 0.526 9 |
组别 | T0 | T1 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 8.21 ± 0.43 | 8.22 ± 0.50 | 0.067 8 | 0.946 3 |
B组 | 8.30 ± 0.47 | 8.39 ± 0.53 | 0.565 4 | 0.575 2 |
t | 0.632 7 | 1.033 4 | ||
P | 0.530 8 | 0.308 0 |
表5两组患者BUN的比较(n = 24,xˉ ± s, mmol/L)
组别 | T0 | T1 | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
A组 | 8.21 ± 0.43 | 8.22 ± 0.50 | 0.067 8 | 0.946 3 |
B组 | 8.30 ± 0.47 | 8.39 ± 0.53 | 0.565 4 | 0.575 2 |
t | 0.632 7 | 1.033 4 | ||
P | 0.530 8 | 0.308 0 |
温度(K) | 猝灭常数 | 结合参数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kq( mol-1s-1) | KSV( mol-1) | R | Ka ( mol-1) | n | R | ||
278 | 1.07 × 1013 | 1.07 × 105 | 0.998 9 | 2.99 × 105 | 1.09 | 0.997 6 | |
298 | 8.07 × 1012 | 8.07 × 102 | 0.999 5 | 1.20 × 105 | 1.03 | 0.999 4 | |
318 | 6.18 × 1012 | 6.18 × 102 | 0.999 6 | 1.24 × 105 | 1.06 | 0.999 2 |
表6不同温度下HSA与HES的猝灭常数和结合参数
温度(K) | 猝灭常数 | 结合参数 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kq( mol-1s-1) | KSV( mol-1) | R | Ka ( mol-1) | n | R | ||
278 | 1.07 × 1013 | 1.07 × 105 | 0.998 9 | 2.99 × 105 | 1.09 | 0.997 6 | |
298 | 8.07 × 1012 | 8.07 × 102 | 0.999 5 | 1.20 × 105 | 1.03 | 0.999 4 | |
318 | 6.18 × 1012 | 6.18 × 102 | 0.999 6 | 1.24 × 105 | 1.06 | 0.999 2 |
HSA∶HES | 二级结构占比 (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
α螺旋 | β折叠 | β转角 | 无规缠绕 | |
1∶0 | 57.4 | 8.2 | 10.3 | 24.1 |
1∶5 | 55.0 | 10.8 | 10.2 | 24.0 |
1∶10 | 53.1 | 11.7 | 9.6 | 25.6 |
表7二级结构CDPro计算软件计算 HSA加入HES后的变化
HSA∶HES | 二级结构占比 (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
α螺旋 | β折叠 | β转角 | 无规缠绕 | |
1∶0 | 57.4 | 8.2 | 10.3 | 24.1 |
1∶5 | 55.0 | 10.8 | 10.2 | 24.0 |
1∶10 | 53.1 | 11.7 | 9.6 | 25.6 |
1 | He Y, Xiao J, Shi Z, et al. Supplementation of enteral nutritional powder decreases surgical site infection, prosthetic joint infection, and readmission after hip arthroplasty in geriatric femoral neck fracture with hypoalbuminemia[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019,14(1): 292. |
2 | 倪友琼.护理干预与营养管理对肝硬化失代偿期患者营养状态的影响[J].泰山医学院学报,2020,41(4):302. |
3 | 胡迪.阿托伐他汀钙联合羟乙基淀粉针治疗分水岭脑梗死的临床效果[J].泰山医学院学报,2017,38(3):341. |
4 | 张建中,曲玲燕,吴量,等. 术中应用6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4对创伤骨科患者血清蛋白的影响机制[J].中华医学杂志, 2020,100(27): 2138. |
5 | 战寒秋,刘慧,孙娜.人血白蛋白治疗肝硬化腹水疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J].药物不良反应杂志,2014,16(2):100. |
6 | Zhang JZ ,Dong CZ, Huang SY, et al. The effect of 6% HES (hydroxyethyl starch) 130/0.4 on the concentration of blood potassium in orthopedic and (acute hemodiulution) patients and itsmechanism exploration[J]. Acta Medica Mediterranea, 2020, 36: 989. |
7 | 田玉,洪佳,王冰琼,等.肝硬化腹水患者长期应用白蛋白治疗的现状与前景[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2021,37(1):173. |
8 | Miyao H. Blood transfusion, colloid therapy and the possible saving of albumin volumes during surgery: data analysis of the survey for certified hospitals of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists[J]. J Anesth, 2016, 30(3): 384. |
9 | Duncan AE , Jia Y, Soltesz E, et al. Effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on kidney and haemostatic function in cardiac surgical patients: A randomised controlled trial[J]. Anaesthesia,2020, (3): 18. |
10 | 邢辰.羟乙基淀粉再惹争议临床应用何去何从?[J].中华医学信息导报, 2018, 33(4):26. |
11 | Lee HJ, Kwon Y, Bae J,et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 6% 130/0.4 in a balanced electrolyte solution and renal function after nephrectomy[J]. Anesth Analg, 2020 ,131(4):1260. |
12 | Pagel JI, Rehm M, Kammerer T, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and its impact on perioperative outcome: A propensity score matched controlled observation study[J]. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2018, 126(6):1949. |
13 | Mai YN, Kimiko Y,Itaru K, et al. Successful granulocyte apheresis using medium molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch[J]. International Journal of Hematology, 2019, 110(6):729. |
14 | Margras A, Herter JM, Kuhne K, et al. 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) diminishes glycocalyx degradation and decreases vascular permeability during systemic and pulmonary inflammation in mice[J]. Critical Care, 2018, 22(1): 111. |
15 | Momeni M, Nkoyena L, Vandyck M, et al. The dose of hydroxyethyl starch 6% 130/0.4 for fluid therapy and the incidence of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: A retrospective matched study[J]. Plos One, 2017, 12(10):e0186403. |
16 | Wojtowicz A, Weber A, Wiecetha-posluszny R, et al. Probing menstrual bloodstain aging with fluorescence spectroscopy[J]. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc,2021, 248(5): 119172. |
17 | Yadav A, Trivedi S, Haridas V, et al. Effect of ionic liquid on the fluorescence of an intramolecular exciplex forming probe[J].Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020;19(2):251. |
18 | 张建中,黄绍艳,王开岩,等.心脏手术患儿6%HES130/0.4急性血液稀释后血钾浓度降低与6%HES130/0.4-HSA复合物的关系[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2020, 40(11):1381. |
19 | Nagy G, Lgaev M, Jones NC,et al. SESCA: Predicting circular dichroism spectra from protein molecular structures[J]. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019, 15(9): 5087. |
20 | Pastermack RF, Collings PJ. Resonance light scattering: A new technique for studying chromophore aggregation[J]. Science, 1995, 269(5226): 935. |
[1] | 梁梅, 江建烨, 毛瑞奎, 饶小胖.糖尿病肾脏疾病与甲状腺功能状态的相关性[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2023, 44(9): 670-674. |
[2] | 凌霞, 王震英, 张莉.Vohwinkel综合症分子遗传学研究进展[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2023, 44(8): 622-626. |
[3] | 刘在博, 吕蒙, 王月兰.围手术期血红蛋白水平与患者预后及非心脏手术后心肌损伤发生率的研究进展[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2023, 44(8): 627-631. |
[4] | 杜雅婷, 于文君, 李燕, 付元磊, 孙考祥.基于Golden Gate高效构建psiCHECK双荧光素酶报告基因的方法及应用[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2023, 44(3): 180-185. |
[5] | 李丽媛, 殷椿茂, 杨帅凯, 贺刚锐, 王利军.老年急性脑梗死患者血清OX-LDL、HSP27水平与脑水肿及短期预后关系[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2023, 44(2): 125-129. |
[6] | 黄永胜, 黄彩娜, 董学岭, 卓秀丽, 房娟娟, 宋文霞, 张雨露, 阎磊, 陈刚, 吕仁广.膀胱尿路上皮癌蛋白组学相关个体化预后特征的推导与验证[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2023, 44(1): 15-23. |
[7] | 郑培贤, 李娜, 詹显全.以表型组为重心的垂体瘤多组学研究[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(9): 641-665. |
[8] | 康慧, 王燕华, 高敏, 张敬军.Fib及GP IIb/IIIa基因多态性与家族聚集性LAA脑梗死的相关性[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(7): 507-512. |
[9] | 范明喆, 田永杰.三结构域家族蛋白在子宫内膜癌中的研究进展[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(6): 471-476. |
[10] | 潘天琦, 闫京锐, 姚俐冰, 杨一帆, 田华, 姚树桐.大蒜素减轻氧化低密度脂蛋白诱导的巨噬细胞焦亡[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(5): 321-326. |
[11] | 杨文荣, 刘君, 张琳, 刘萌, 崔刚, 陈立勇.全生活方式干预下高蛋白膳食对超重/肥胖患者的减重效果[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(4): 287-291. |
[12] | 蔡晓雯, 梁英, 蒋东洋, 张琼, 葛亚龙.表现为肺炎的肺栓塞1例并文献分析[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(3): 219-222. |
[13] | 王舒钧, 田秀青.铁死亡抑制蛋白1:心肌再灌注损伤的潜在治疗靶点[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(2): 138-141. |
[14] | 王猛, 李培瑞, 卢新霞, 王英杰, 纪龙, 李晓梅, 丁国永, 齐艳波, 邢薇佳, 侯海峰, 王芳, 邓阳, 李栋.新冠肺炎疫情期间山东省高校大学生心理应激反应与免疫球蛋白G N-聚糖的相关性[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(12): 911-917. |
[15] | 李淑君, 陈登攀, 孙悦东, 周新玲, 高云, 周发展.MPVLR联合hs-CRP对PCI术后对比剂肾病的预测价值[J]. betway必威登陆网址 (betway.com )学报, 2022, 43(12): 924-931. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||